期刊文献+

民初“二次革命”前知识分子群体关于联邦制的论争——以《民立报》、《庸言》、《东方杂志》为中心 被引量:3

Debate on federal system from intellectuals between the Building of the Republic of China and the 1913 Revolution——Taking Minli Daily, Yongyan and Eastern Miscellany as center
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清末传入中国的联邦制思想,在民初新的政治环境中,引起了知识分子群体的极大关注和论争。《民立报》所代表的革命派知识分子主张有限的中央集权,即某种程度的地方分权;《庸言》所代表的原立宪派知识分子主张中央集权;而《东方杂志》则折衷于二者之间。同时三者还提出了各自对地方制度的不同主张。他们的态度和主张与民初政局的复杂多变以及各自所代表阶层利益的不同有着很大的关系。 The end of the Qing spread to Chinese the federal system thought, in the beginning of people in new political context, has aroused the intellectual community's enormous interest and the debate. “Minli Daily”represents to send the intellectual to advocate the limited centralization, namely some kind of degree decentralization; “Yongyan”represents the original Constitutionalism Faction intellectual advocates the centralization; but “Eastern Miscellany”then compromised between two. At the sometime three also proposed respectively to the local got system different position. Their manner and the position and at the beginning of the people the political situation complex is changeable as well as each one represents the social stratum differently to have the very big relations.
作者 张季
机构地区 中山大学历史系
出处 《安徽史学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第5期52-57,共6页 Historical Research In Anhui
关键词 联邦制 知识分子 论争 federal system intellectual debate
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献57

  • 1潘树藩.中华民国宪法史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1935.
  • 2《民国大事日志》第1册,第501页,第524页.
  • 3《苏格兰法(1998)》第98条和附件6规范了地方分权问题(Devolution Issues)及其裁决,而苏格兰议会立法是否超越其权限范围是首先包含进地方分权问题的争议的(附件6第1条第1款)。高等法庭和上诉法庭拥有裁决的权力,而最终裁决的权力在于枢密院司法委员会。
  • 4Michael T. Newton, Peter J. Donaghy Institutions of Modern Spain——A Political and Economic Guide Cambridge University Press 1997, P117.
  • 5Neil Walker Beyond the Unitary Conception of the United Kingdom Constitution?in Public Law 2000 Autumn, P390.
  • 6中国大百科全书·政治学卷[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1992.39.
  • 7童子伟.国家结构形式论[M].武汉大学出版社,1997.144-147,146.
  • 8布莱克维尔大百科全书[M].中国政法大学出版社,1992.255.
  • 9see Hans Keman Federalism and Policy Performance——A conceptual and empirical inquiry from Federalism and Policy Performance edited by Ute Wachendorfer-Schmidt, Routledgel ECPR Studies in European Political Science, Routledge 2000, P202-205.
  • 10A. V. Dicey Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution London Macmillan, 1952 P29.

共引文献54

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部