期刊文献+

经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的相关性研究 被引量:4

The relative research of transurethral resection of the hyperplastic prostate with bipolar plasmakinetic technique
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道等离子体双极电切的安全性与有效性.方法用经尿道等离子体双极电切行前列腺切除(PKRP)90例,前列腺20~106 g,平均(46.7±32.8)g;术后随访3~6月.结果 (PKRP)手术时间13~98 min;切除前列腺组织重量17~81 g,平均(35±26)g.无1例需输血,无电切综合征发生.平均插尿管时间2 d(1~4 d),术后3~6个月,最大尿流率(Qmax)由术前的(5.6±3.4)mL/s,分别上升至(19.6±4.2)、(21.8±4.4)、(22.8±5.1)mL/s;国际前列腺评分(IPSS)由术前的23.1下降至5.2、5.1、5.0;生活质量评分(QOL)由术前的5.6下降至1.6、1.7、1.1.3项指标手术前后比较差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05).结论用等离子体双极电切进行PKRP 安全有效. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of transurethral resection of the prostate (PKRP) with plasmakinetic energy. Methods 90 patients (mean age of 71.6 years; ranging from 52 to 91) with symptomatic BPH without suspected cancer (confirmed by IPSS, unrtient flow rate, ultrasonographic estimate and PSA tests) were treated by PKRP. All patients were followed up for 3-6 months postoperatively. Results In PKRP, the duration of the procedure was (48±31) minutes (ranging from 13 to 98 minutes). No case needed blood transfusion during the operation. No transurethral resection syndrome occurred. The mean catheterization time was 2 days (1 to 4 days). The peak flow rate increased from (5.6 ± 3.4) mL/s to (19.6±4.2)mL/s, (21.8±4.4)mL/s, (22.8±5.1)mL/s at 1, 3 and 6 months respectively. The IPSS decreased from 23.1 to 5.2, 5.1, 5.0 and the QOL decreased from 5.6 to 1.6, 1.7,1.1 at 1, 3 and 6 months respectively. Conclusion It is suggested that transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate is effective and safe.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2005年第5期273-274,共2页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 前列腺增生 等离子 双极电切 prostatic hyperplasia bipolar electrocautery plasmakinetic transurethral
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Botto H, Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyus Device [J]. J Endourol, 2001,15:319-322.
  • 2Ramsey EW. Benijgn prostatic hyperplasia: a review [J]. Can J Urol, 2000, 7:1135-1143.
  • 3Mebust W, Holtgrewe H, Cocket APC, et al. Transurethral pyostectomy :immediate and post operation complication. A comparative study of to participating institution evaluating 3885 patients [J]. J Urol, 1989,141:243-247.
  • 4Virdi J, KApasi F, Chandrasekar P, et al. A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate [J]. J Urol, 2000,163:268-269.
  • 5Donovan JI, Peters TJ, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate. laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign prostatic enargement:the ClasP study [J]. J Urol, 2000,164:65-70.
  • 6Botto H, Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device [J]. J Endourol, 2001,15(3):313-316.

同被引文献14

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部