摘要
本文通过对民族地区基层一般民、刑事纠纷解决途径的解读,欲从程序、效力和利益分配结果的表象探析,以一种新的视角揭示出民族地区基层纠纷的解决是在现行法与民族习惯、民间法则相互塑造和挤压的过程中,当事人、民族地区社会权威、司法者之间权衡利益得失之下,对公平、正义和利益等和谐社会法治理念的妥协。其主要表现是对现行法的规避,结果使现行法趋于架空,当事人利益难以保障,正义之剑形同虚设。
By interpreting the general civil and penal conflicts in nation grass - roots units, and analysing the superficial phenomenon of procedure, effect and the result of interests sharing, this article reveals the settlement to conflicts in nation grass - roots units. This settlement is a compromise among fairness, justice, interests and the belief of harmonious legal society. In the process of interaction with the current laws, nation' s customs and folk rules, the party concerned, nation authoritative person and justice executives balances advantages and disadvantages. It shows mainly evading the current laws, and as a result of difficulty to secure benefits of the party concemed, the law can' t work well.
出处
《青海民族研究》
北大核心
2005年第4期30-36,共7页
Qinghai Journal of Ethnology
关键词
民族地区
纠纷
民族权威
双重司法
妥协
nation areas
conflicts
nation authorities
double justice
compromise