论违约责任与侵权责任竞合的内涵——从与台湾法比较的角度解释《合同法》第122条

Connotation of the Coincidence of Liability for Breaking a Contract and Tort——To Understand Article 122 of The Contract Law Comparing to Taiwan's Civil Law

大陆民法与台湾民法同属大陆法系,大陆在制定《中华人民共和国合同法》时,借鉴了台湾的立法及学说。但与台湾法相比,我国大陆法中的侵权责任方式有很大的不同,除台湾法中的损害赔偿外尚有大量的非财产责任。因此,《中华人民共和国合同法》第122条只能理解为违约损害赔偿责任与侵权损害赔偿责任的竞合,也只有如此才能切实保护当事人的利益。

Both the mainland＇ s civil law and the Taiwan＇ s civil law belong to civil law system. We benefit from Taiwan＇ s civil law and doctrines in making the Contract Law of the P. R. C... But comparing to Taiwan＇ s civil law, there are a lot of modes of liability for tort except damages in the mainland civil law. It is the coincidence of contractual and tortious damages, the connotation of the coincidence of liability for breaking a contract and tort in Article 122 of the Contract Law of the P. R. C. that help protect the parties＇ legitimate interests.