期刊文献+

外商直接投资、市场集中与福利效应分析——以我国零售产业为例 被引量:5

Foreign Direct Investment, Market Concentration and Welfare Effect ——Taking China's Retailing Industry for Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在全球经济一体化的背景下,产业资本的跨国流动呈现日益加速的趋势。实证研究显示:外商直接投资与发展中东道国目标产业市场集中度之间存在着明显的正相关关系。成本非对称的古诺竞争均衡表明:跨国公司的成本优势使其产量和市场份额相对较大,市场份额的扩大使其价格偏离帕累托最优水平的程度越大即市场势力增强,造成的社会福利损失也越大。以此为理论基础,对跨国公司进入下我国零售产业的市场集中效应进行了实证检验。 With the integration of global economy, the transnational flows of industry capital take on an increasingly accelerating trend. Empirical research indicates that foreign direct investment has direct correlativity with the market concentration of the target industry of developing host-country. The Nash equilibrium of Cournot game model shows that the cost advantage of transnational corporation makes its quantity higher and market share bigger, and the increasing market share makes the price away from Pareto optimum to a larger degree, i.e. more market power results in more loss of social welfare. With this as the theoretical foundation, it makes an empirical test on the market concentration effect of China's retailing industry while more transnational corporations come in.
作者 岳中刚
出处 《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2005年第5期76-79,共4页 JOURNAL OF BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY:SOCIAL SCIENCES
关键词 外商直接投资(FDI) 市场集中 福利效应 Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) market concentration welfare effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1马龙龙,裴艳丽.零售商买方势力的滥用及其对策研究[J].商业经济与管理,2003(5):4-8. 被引量:38
  • 2.《世界上最有影响 力的企业》[N].《参考消息》,2004年5月7日.
  • 3Dunning J. H., Multinational Enterprises: Market Structure, Economic Power and Industrial Policy.
  • 4Journal of World Trade Law, 1975(4).
  • 5Cornor, J.M , The Market Power of Multinationals, New York, Praeger, 1977.
  • 6Willmore L., Determinants of Industrial Structure : a Brazilian Case Study, Vol.15, UNLTNC.
  • 7Demsetz, H Industrial Structure. Market Rivalry, and Public Policy [J]. Journal of Law & Economics, vo1.16,1973.
  • 8赵玻.零售商市场势力及其福利效应[J].财经理论与实践,2005,26(1):94-98. 被引量:20

二级参考文献13

  • 1Neil Wrigley & Michelle Lowe. Reading Retail- A geographical perspective on retailing and consumption spaces[M], 2001.
  • 2Donald. Hay, Derek J. Morris. Industrial Economics and Organization [M]. Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • 3Andrew Schotter. Microeconomics: A Modem Approach[M]. Pearson Education, Inc, 2001.
  • 4John England. Retail Impact Assessment [ M ]. 2000.
  • 5Jacob,son, J M, and Dorrnan, G J. Monopsony Revisited: A Comment of Blair and Harrison[R]. Antitrust Bulletin, 1992,37:151 - 170.
  • 6Comanor, William S. and Patrick Rey. Vertical Restraints and the Market Power of Large Distributors[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2000,17:135- 153.
  • 7Farris, P W, and Ailawaeli, K L. Retail Power: Monster or Mouse? [J]. Journal of Retailing, 1992,68:351 - 369.
  • 8London Economics. Competition in Retailing[R]. OFT Research Paper No. 13. 1997.
  • 9Federal Trade Commission. Report on the Federal Trade Commission Workshop on Slotting Allowances and Other Marketing Practices in the Grocery Industry[R]. 2001.1.
  • 10Dobmn Consulting. Buyer Power and Its Impact on Competition in the Food Retail Sector of the European Union[R]. Report Prepared for the European Commission - DGIV. Study Contract No IV/98/ETD/078. 1999.

共引文献49

同被引文献19

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部