摘要
在反倾销中,企业个体分散的最优应诉决策带来的收益之和离企业整体的最优应诉决策带来的总收益有一定的差距,这导致企业应诉不力。企业应诉不力除了应诉结果具有非排他性导致企业的“搭便车”行为的因素外,还与每个企业的出口规模、总体出口规模及其集中度密切相关。协商是提高应诉率的途径之一,它可以优化总体出口规模与集中度的匹配关系,减轻“搭便车”行为,但其作用的发挥受协商成本大小的限制。
In the anti-dumping, there is a difference between the sum of profit achieved by separate firm pleading and that by joint firm pleading, which is partly due to the free rider behavior and pleading cost. Consulting is an effective way to raise the rate of pleading. However, the effect is restricted by its cost.
出处
《财经研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第10期124-136,共13页
Journal of Finance and Economics
关键词
反倾销
应诉
决策
anti-dumping
pleading
decision