期刊文献+

南水北调西线工程区及邻域的活动构造 被引量:6

ACTIVE TECTONICS ALONG SITE AND NEIGHBORHOOD OF WEST ROUTE OF SOUTH-TO-NORTH WATER TRANSFER PROJECT IN CHINA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 南水北调西线一期工程在构造上位于青藏高原东部的巴颜喀拉地块内部,块体的四周边界以巨型走滑断裂和逆断裂为特征,构造运动非常强烈,是块体运动引发应力集中和释放能量的主要场所。但块体内部构造活动性较弱,仅发现甘德—阿坝断裂系北支断裂在阿坝盆地段的部分断裂、色达—洛若断裂和康勒断裂等晚更新世以来有过活动,且规模和运动强度远小于地块边界断裂。晚第四纪以来地块边界断裂的位移速率大多在7 mm/a以上,最大达18 mm/a,最小为1~2 mm/a,而输水隧洞附近最主要的活断层顺河断裂的位移速率仅为0.18 mm/a,相对地块边界断裂小1~2个数量级,可以认为工程场地处于构造相对稳定的地区。给出了阿坝盆地北缘断裂、顺河断裂等活断裂在工程使用期内最大设防的倾滑位移量,分别为0.67和2.62 m。 The first stage project of the west route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project is located in Bayankela block interior of the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The boundary of Bayankela block is all the giant strike-slip or thrust fault systems, which have intense activity; and the boundary belts are the primary sites of the accumulation and release of stress resulted from the blocks movement. The fault activity is weaker in Bayankela block interior than that of the boundary belts. Partial faults of Gande-Aba fault system, Seda-Luoruo fault, and Kangle fault, etc., were active at one time since Late Pleistocene epoch. However, they have weaker active intensity than the boundary belt. The average displacement rates of the block boundary faults in the late Quaternary Period were generally more than 7 mm/a; the maximum value was up to 18 mm/a, and the minimum one was 1-2 mm/a; however, the slip rate of the most primary active fault at the raceway vicinity is only 0.18 mm/a In general, the crust of the project site is relative stable. The maximum dip-offset of the faults needed to be protected for the project during useful life has been deduced; for example, for the Aba basin north marginal fault and the Shunhe fault the maximum value is 0.67 m and 2.62 m, respectively.
出处 《岩石力学与工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第20期3664-3672,共9页 Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2004CB418400)
关键词 工程地质 南水北调西线 输水隧洞 活动构造 潜在断裂位错 engineering geology west route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project diversion tunnel active fault potential dislocation of fault
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1冉勇康,陈立春.中国长线工程场地地震安全性评价工作中的活动构造问题[J].地震地质,2004,26(4):733-741. 被引量:11
  • 2中华人民共和国国家标准编写组.工程场地地震安全性评价技术规范(GB17741—1999)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999..
  • 3Wallace R E. Earthquake recurrence intervals on the San Andreas fault[J]. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1970, 81(10):2875 - 2890.
  • 4Schwartz D P, Coppersmith K J. Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 1984, 89(B7): 5 681 - 5 698.
  • 5Yeats R S, Pentice C S. Introduction to speccial section:paleoseismology[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 1996, 101(B3): 5 847 - 5 853.
  • 6邓起东 刘百篪 张培震.活动断裂工程安全评价和位错量的定量评估[A].国家地震局地质研究所编.活动断裂研究(2)[C].北京:地震出版社,1992.236-246.
  • 7邓起东,陈立春,冉勇康.活动构造定量研究与应用[J].地学前缘,2004,11(4):383-392. 被引量:112
  • 8冉勇康,邓起东.古地震学研究的历史、现状和发展趋势[J].科学通报,1999,44(1):12-20. 被引量:85
  • 9Cluff L S. Bridging the gap between earthquake science and engineering: The story of the trans-alaska pipeline performance during the Mw 7.9, 2002 earthquake[A]. In: Pr.oc.eedings of the Third International Conference on Contininental Earthquakes, ICCE[C]. [s.1.]: [s.n.], 2004.63-68.
  • 10邓起东,张培震,冉勇康,杨晓平,闵伟,楚全芝.中国活动构造基本特征[J].中国科学(D辑),2002,32(12):1020-1030. 被引量:702

二级参考文献131

共引文献2348

同被引文献73

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部