期刊文献+

基于SINTAP标准的海底外输管线安全评定 被引量:3

SAFETY ASSESSMENT USED FOR WELDED PIPELINE BASED ON SBSTAP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用欧共体提出的结构完整性评定方法SINTAP(StructuralIntegrityAssessmentProcedure)对海底外输管线API5LX56焊接接头埋藏裂纹进行了安全评定。根据母材和全焊缝拉伸试验结果建立评定曲线;根据BS7448:Part4标准采用多试样方法进行了低温断裂韧性试验,建立了焊缝和HAZ的CTOD—R阻力曲线,从而确定了启裂CTOD值δ0.2。在评定计算中取不同水深的应力最大值,考虑残余应力的影响,针对由DNVOS—F101中规定的最大错位情况,给出了在铺设条件下的容许埋藏裂纹尺寸。为管线铺设工程中的焊接缺陷验收和拒收提供了依据。 Structure Integrity Assessment Procedure (SINTAP) put forward by the European Commission was applied in safety assessment for welded joints of the API 5LX56 pipe line steel with embedded flaw. Assessment curves derived from the tensile test results of parent materials and welded seam were obtained. Based on BS 7448 standard, CTOD-R resistance curve of welded seam and HAZ derived from low temperature fracture toughness test was obtained, from which CTOD value leading to crack was determined. The assessment was carried out using the maximum stress at different water depth considering residual stress. The tolerable embedded flaw sizes were achieved in maximum allowable misalignment, which supply standard to evaluate the acceptability of flaws in pipe line paving engineering.
出处 《焊接》 北大核心 2005年第9期17-20,共4页 Welding & Joining
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50375109)中国海洋石油工程股份有限公司资助项目。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Stephen Webster, Adam Bannister. Structural integrity assessment procedure for Europe of the SIMAP programme overview. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67(6): 481 ~ 514.
  • 2Zerbst U, Hamann R, Wohlschlegel A. Application of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP to pipes. The International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2000,77( 11 ): 697 ~ 702.
  • 3Ainsworth R A, Gutierrez- Solana F, Ruiz Ocejo J. Analysis levels within the SINTAP defect assessment procedures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000,67(6): 515 ~ 527.
  • 4BS7448: Part 4:1997 Method for determination of fracture resistance curves and initiation values for stable crack extension in metallic materials..
  • 5BS7448: Part 2:1997 Method for determination of KIC, critical CTOD and critical J values of welds in metallic materials..
  • 6Stacey A, Barthelemy J- Y, Leggatt R H. Incorporation of residual stresses into the SINTAP defect assessment procedure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67(6): 573 ~ 611.

同被引文献14

  • 1刘明亮,张玉凤,霍立兴,邓彩艳.海底管道安全性评定方法的分析[J].焊接学报,2006,27(8):75-78. 被引量:6
  • 2川畑友弥,堺埆英男,大西一志,等.高張力鋼継手の耐脆性破壊特性に及ぼす溶接継手軟質化の影響[C]∥溶接学会论文集,2010:296-304.
  • 3Yun-Jae Kim,Robert A Ainsworth,Uwe Zerbst,et al.SINTAPdefect assessment procedure for strength mis-matched structures[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2000,67:529-546.
  • 4矢岛浩.船体构造的断裂控制管理[C]∥北京:中国造船工程学会船舶结构疲劳与断裂学组,1982:26-27.
  • 5Bannister A C,Ruiz Ocejo J,Gutierrez-Solana F.Implications ofthe yield stress/tensile stress ratio to the SINTAP failure assess-ment diagrams for homogeneous materials[J].Engineering Frac-ture Mechanics,2000,67,547-562.
  • 6WEM/SINTAP/PROC-7/CONTENTS REGP. SINTAP Procedure Final Version: November 1999[S]. 2000.
  • 7川烟友弥,坍蛹英男,大西一志,等.高饭力镧继手の耐脆性破坏特性に及はす溶接继手敦耍化の影警[C].溶接学会论文集,2010,28(3):296-304.
  • 8Kim Yun-Jae, Ainsworth R A, Zerbst U, et al. SINTAP defect assessment procedure for strength mis-matched structures [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67: 529-546.
  • 9矢岛浩.船体构造的断裂控制管理[R].北京:中国造船工程学会船舶结构疲劳与断裂学组整理,1982:26-27.
  • 10British Energy Generation Ltd. Stress Intensity Factor and Limit Load Handbook[R]. Engineering Division EPD/GEN/REP/ 0316/98 ISSUE 2, 1999.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部