摘要
目的了解牙齿直接和间接用树脂修复后的牙体的抗力特性。方法40颗无龋前磨牙,制成MOD洞,然后分成4组,分别以Renew树脂直接充填,Renew直接嵌体修复,Tescera间接嵌体修复,制洞后不加修复。另以10颗完整前磨牙为对照。对上述所有牙齿采用力学模型静态力学加载实验,并进行对比分析研究。结果备洞未修复组牙齿的断裂载荷最小,与Renew树脂充填、Renew直接嵌体修复、Tescera间接嵌体修复及完整牙组有显著性差异(P<0.05);Renew树脂充填、Renew直接嵌体修复、Tescera间接嵌体修复和完整牙组之间抗断裂载荷无显著性差异(P>0.05)。在断裂模式上,Renew树脂充填组、Renew直接嵌体修复组和Tescera间接嵌体修复组分别出现9、3和1个样本树脂断裂。结论复合树脂充填和嵌体修复都能提高缺损牙齿的牙体抗力,复合树脂经过复合固化处理后力学性能有所提高。复合树脂不同固化处理对牙体抗力无明显影响。
Objective:To evaluate the fracture resistance of teeth restored with direct and indirect restorations of composite resin. Method:Fifty maxillary premolars were divided at random into five groups with ten teeth in each group. Standardized MOD cavities were prepared in the teeth of group 1,2,3 and 4 ,and then restored with :①direct filling composite resin( Renew, Bisco USA ), ②direct composite inlay ( Renew Bisco USA ), ③indirect composite resin inlay(Tescera Biseo, USA), and ④ unrestored. Intact teeth( group ⑤) were served as the control. The fracture resistance of the specimens was tested by loading compressive force at 1 mm/min using a universal testing machine. Result:The breaking load ( kN ) in group ①, ②, ③, ④ and ⑤ was 2. 06 ± 0.76,2. 30 ±0.49, 2.62 ±0.68,1.24 ±0.44 and 2.40±0.71 respectively. There was no significant difference among group ①,②, ③ and ⑤(P 〉 0.05 ). Significant difference was found between group ④ and ①, ②,③ or ⑤(P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion:Both direct and indirect composite resin can strengthen the fracture resistance of restored teeth.
出处
《实用口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第5期600-602,共3页
Journal of Practical Stomatology