城市公用事业民营化法律路径的比较分析

Comparison and Analysis of the Law Path to Urban Public Utilities Privatization

传统观念认为城市公用事业应当由政府所有和经营以维护公共利益,但是20世纪80年代以来,世界各国纷纷进行城市公用事业民营化的改革。当前,在我国,城市公用事业旧的经营模式的弊端已经暴露,越来越多的人开始认识到政府在城市公用事业供应中应承担责任并不等于政府直接生产产品或服务,实际上,私人生产和政府安排的有机结合更有效率。公私合资经营、合同外包和特许权经营都是实现城市公用事业民营化的有效法律路径,但是应依据具体项目的特征慎重选择甚至混合使用。

The traditional idea that urban public utilities should be possessed and poerated by the government for the public benefits has changed since 80＇s in 20 centuries.For the old business model of urban public utilities has already exposed disadvantages in our country,more and more persons begin to know that government responsibility for urban public utilities is not unequal to product directly and the combining of private producing and government arranging is more efficient. Public-Private joint venture,contracting-out and concessionary dealing are all valid law paths to urban public utilities privatization, but they are choice or hybrid arrange in the concrete item.