期刊文献+

考虑电力合约的激励性市场机制设计 被引量:20

THE MECHANISM DESIGN TO ELECTRICITY MARKETS CONSIDERING CONTRACT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 电力市场中无论是统一竞价机制还是按报价支付机制都难于激励发电商报真实成本,其策略性报价危及电力系统的安全和经济运行。该文以机制设计理论为基础,设计了一种考虑电力合约的激励性机制。该机制在实现经济调度的同时能有效的激励发电机组上报真实成本,从而引导发电容量投资,实现社会资源的合理配置。算例分析表明,所设计的机制对边际、边际附近或以上机组的激励更为有效,既能保证各机组合理回收容量成本又能抑制其暴利行为。 In electricity market, it is very difficult to inspirit the generation companies to bid the true cost with either the uniform price auction or pay-as-bid auction. The tactful pricing of generation companies will be harmful to the security and economical operation of power system. Based on the mechanism design theory, an incentive mechanism considering contract was put forward in this paper. The mechanism is able to inspirit the generation companies to bid the true cost effectively and carry out economical operation as well. Then it can attract the generation capacity investment and configure the social resource reasonably. The illustration demonstrates the new mechanism can more effectively inspirit the generation companies on, near or over the system marginal cost, and it is able to ensure reasonable capacity cost recovery and restrain the sudden huge profits of all generation companies.
出处 《中国电机工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第18期57-63,共7页 Proceedings of the CSEE
关键词 电力市场 机制设计 合约电量 竞价电量 Electricity market Mechanism design Contract volume Competitive bidding volume
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献46

  • 1赵晋泉 侯志俭 吴际舜(Zhao Jinquan Hou Zhijian Wu Jishun).新的基于OPF的有功无功一体化实时电价模型及算法(Novel OPF-based,active and reactive combined spot price model and its algorithm)[J].上海交通大学学报,.
  • 2朱善利.微观经济学[M].北京大学出版社,2002..
  • 3[2]Mannila T, Korpinen L. Hedging New Electricity Market Risks in the Concentrated Market-places in the European Union. In: International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT 2000). City University (London): 2000. 587~591
  • 4Hobbs B F, Metzler C, Pang J. Strategic gaming analysis for electric power networks: an MPEC approach[J]. IEEE Trans. On Power Systems, 2000. 15(2): 638-645.
  • 5Singh H, Hao S, Papalexopoulos A. Transmission congestion management in competitive electricity markets[J]. IEEE Trans. On Power Systems, 1998, 13(2): 672-680.
  • 6Wu F F, Varaiya P. Coordinated multilateral trades for electric power networks: theory and implementation[J]. International Journal of Electric Power and Energy Systems, 1999, 21(2): 75-102.
  • 7Gan D, Chen Q. Locational marginal pricing: new england prospective presentation summary for panel session flow-gate and location based pricing approaches and their impacts[C]. Columbus of Ohio,Proceedings of IEEE PES Winter Meeting, 2001.
  • 8Ethier R, Zimmerman R, Mount T, et al. A uniform price auction with locational price adjustments for competitive electricity markets[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems,1999, 21(2): 103-110.
  • 9Richter C W, Sheble G. Genetic algorithm evolution of utility bidding strategies for the competitive marketplace[J]. IEEE Trans. On Power Systems, 1998, 13(1): 256-261.
  • 10Zimmerman R, Thomas R, Gau D. et al. A web-besed platform for experimental investigation of electric power auctions[J]. Decision Support Systems, 1999, 24(3-4): 193-205.

共引文献271

同被引文献239

引证文献20

二级引证文献148

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部