期刊文献+

“承认”与中国对南沙群岛享有无可争辩的主权 被引量:4

“Acknowledge” and China’s Unarguable Sovereignty over Nansha Islands
原文传递
导出
摘要 承认与禁止反言已经成为一项公认的国际法准则。本文通过对著名的国际法学家关于“承认”、“禁止反言”的论述以及一些著名案例的分析,认为越南、菲律宾、马来西亚等国已经承认了中国对南沙群岛享有的领土主权,因此这些国家就应承担不能反悔的法律责任。 Acknowledge and estoppel have been internationally recognized rules. This paper, after reviewing the discussions made by distinguished internationalists and analyzing some famous cases, thinks that Vietnam, Philippine and Malaysia have admitted that China takes the territorial sovereignty of the Nansha Islands, and therefore these countries should undertake the law responsibility being not able to go back on what they have admitted.
作者 杨翠柏
出处 《中国边疆史地研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期119-123,共5页 China's Borderland History and Geography Studies
关键词 承认 禁止反言 南沙群岛 主权 “承认” 领土主权 中国 国际法准则 争辩 有无 Acknowledge Estoppel The Nasha Islands Sovereignty
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Legal Status of Eastern Green Land (Denmark-Norway),Georg Schwarzenberger,International Law,Vol.1,Stevens & Sons,Limited 119 & 120 Chanery Lane,Law Publishers,1945,Appendix 4,pp.316-317.
  • 2D.W.Greig,International Law,Second Edition,Butter Worths,London,1976,p.148.
  • 3Lawrence B.Evans,Leading Cases on International Law,Second Edition,Chicago,Callaghan and Company,1922,p.107.
  • 4R.Y.Jennings,The Acquisition of Territory in International Law,Manchester University Press,U.S.A.Ocean Publications INC,1961,p.36.
  • 5Green Haywood Hackworth,Digest of International Law,Volume I,United States,Government Printing Office,Washington,1940.p.436.
  • 6Legal Status of Eastern Green Land (Denmark-Norway),Georg Schwarzenberger,International Law,Vol.1,Stevens & Sons,Limited 119 & 120 Chanery Lane,Law Publishers,1945,Appendix 4,p.317.
  • 7R.Y.Jennings,The Acquisition of Territory in International Law,Manchester University Press,U.S.A.Ocean Publications INC,1961,p.41.
  • 8李浩培.《条约法概论》[M].法律出版社,1988年版.第596-597页.
  • 9D.W.Greig,International Law,Second Edition,Butter Worths,London,1976,pp.148-149.The Palmas Islands Arbitration.Bishop,International Law,Cases and Materials.p.268.
  • 10.《国际法院报告书》[R].,1962.63.

共引文献25

同被引文献183

引证文献4

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部