摘要
本文研究由江永《翼梅》(又名《数学》)一书引发的关于中西天文学的争论,详细说明了江永与梅文鼎之间的不同学术观点,分析了江永与梅成之间的争论以及钱大昕、阮元等人对江永的批评,认为这场争论的要害不在学术问题上,而是有其政治的、社会的和个人的背景。
This paper deals with the debate on the traditional Chinese and western astronomies between Jiang Yong and Mei Juecheng,which are caused by Jiang Yong's(16821764) astronomical work Yimei(A Complement to Mei Wending's Work).The author lists the different points of view between Jiang Yong and Mei Wending(1633-1721),analyzes the debate between Jiang Yong and Mei Juecheng,a grandson of Mei Wending,and both the negative criticism of Qian Daxin(1728-1804),Ruan Yuan(1764-1849) and others.It comes to the conclusion that the key problem of the debate is mainly not academic but political,social,and personal.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第5期79-84,共6页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature