期刊文献+

灌区农业水价研究的条件价值评估法 被引量:20

Application of Contingent Valuation Method in Research on Agricultural Water Price of Irrigation District
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国内首次将条件价值评估法(CVM)引入灌区农业水价研究领域中,在介绍CVM研究的基础上,提出了灌区农业水价CVM应用研究的基本思路与操作框架,探讨了该方法在我国灌区领域应用的可行性,并对该方法的应用研究提出了相关建议。 In this paper, the contingent valuation method (CVM) was inducted into research field of agricultural water price of irrigation district for the first time in China. Based on the introduction of research on CVM, the authors put forward basic means and operated frame for application of CVM in research on agricultural water price of irrigation district, discussed the feasibility of application of CVM in irrigation district, and gave some suggestions for the research on application of CVM.
出处 《节水灌溉》 北大核心 2005年第5期2-4,共3页 Water Saving Irrigation
基金 河海大学学生科技基金项目资助(2004-12)
关键词 条件价值评估法 农业水价 灌区 contingent valuation method (CVM) agricultural water price irrigation district
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1张志强,徐中民,程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(3):454-463. 被引量:247
  • 2Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, et al. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation[R]. Federal Register, 1993, 58:4601 -4614.
  • 3Whittington, D. Administering Contingent Valuation Surveys in Developing Countries[J]. World Development, 1998, 26 (1): 21-30.
  • 4FAO. Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method in Developing Countries: a Survey[M]. Economic and Social Development, 2000,146.
  • 5Hoehn, J P , Randall A. A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1987, 14 : 226- 247.
  • 6Chambers R. Participatory Rural Appraisal(PRA):Analysis of Experience[J]. World Development, 1994, 22:1253- 1268.
  • 7徐中民,张志强,龙爱华,陈东景,巩增泰,苏志勇,张勃,石惠春.额济纳旗生态系统服务恢复价值评估方法的比较与应用[J].生态学报,2003,23(9):1841-1850. 被引量:95
  • 8薛达元.长白山自然保护区生物多样性非使用价值评估[J].中国环境科学,2000,20(2):141-145. 被引量:108
  • 9Singh B , R Ramasubban, R Bhatia J, et al. Rural water supply in Kerala, India: How to Emerge from a Low-level Equilibrium Trap[J]. Water Resources Research, 1993, 29 (7): 1931-1942.
  • 10Kramer R A , N Sharma, M Munasinghe. Valuing Tropical Forests:Methodology and Case Study of Madagascar[M]. Environment Paper, No. la. Washington: World Bank, 1995.

二级参考文献41

  • 1[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179.
  • 2[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612.
  • 3[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29.
  • 4[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
  • 5[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148.
  • 6[17]Lovett A, Bateman I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects [J]. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001, 25: 131-139.
  • 7[18]Smith V K. Non-market valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal [J]. Land Economics, 1993, 69: 1-26.
  • 8[19]Brown T C, Gregory R. Why the WTP-WTA disparity matters [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28: 323-335.
  • 9[20]Hanemann W M. The economic theory of WTP and WTA [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.42-96.
  • 10[21]Bishop R C, Heberlein T A. Measuring values of extra-Market goods: Are indirect measures biased? [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979, 61(5): 926-930.

共引文献389

同被引文献230

引证文献20

二级引证文献194

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部