摘要
福柯的人文科学考古学与库恩的科学哲学分别在不同的知识领域揭示了知识话语的冲突机制,因而可视为思想考古学的两个来源。他们的研究存在几个共同的前提性观点:非连续性历史观、非中心化的主体观、实践性的知识观、不确定性的语言观和微观性的权力观。这些前提性观点使思想考古学成为当代学者分析与解读社会现象的一种重要的方法论。
Thought archeology has two theoretical sources: one is archeology of human science of M. Foucauh's; the another is science philosophy of T. Kuhn' s. both of which scooped out the clashing mechanism in the different knowledge realm. There exist several premising standpoints of the lwo philosophers, namely, non-continuous history view; non- centering corpus view; practising knowledge view; indetermination language view; tiny power view, which makes a result that thought archeology is increasing growing up as an important methodology of examining present social phenomean.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第10期99-102,112,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
方法论
思想考古学
福柯
库恩
thought archeology
methodology
M. Foucauh
T. Kuhn