期刊文献+

论比较广告的法律规制 被引量:18

原文传递
导出
摘要 欧美大多数国家都承认比较广告的合法性,因为它能够为消费者提供更多信息,有利于消费者理性选购,并且能鼓励发明创新和促进市场竞争,同时比较广告又具有误导公众、贬低竞争者产品或服务以及不正当利用竞争者商誉的倾向,因此各国都对比较广告作了严格的限制。我国应当允许比较广告,并应对比较广告作出法律规制。
出处 《法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第10期60-67,共8页 Law Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Saxlehner v. Wagner, 216 US 375, 30 S Ct 298, 54 LEd 525 (1910).
  • 2Comparative Advertising in the United States-Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Directorate for Financial,Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs, Committee on Consumer Policy-10.02.92.
  • 3Directive of European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 1997 Amending Directive 84/450/EEC Concerning Misleading Advertising so as to include Comparative Advertising (97/55/EC).
  • 4Samia M. Kinnani Cross-border Comparative Advertising in the European Union, 19B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 201,pp205-206.
  • 5Benelux Uniform Trademark Act, art. 31 (a) (1), (2).
  • 6A Resolution on the Preliminary Programme of the European Economic Community for a Consumer Protection and Information Policy.Point 3 of the Annex to the Council Resolution of 14 Apr. 1975.
  • 7Cornelia Pechmann and S. Rameshwar, The Use of Comparative Advertising for Brand Positioning: Association versus Differentiation,18 Journal of Consumer Research 145 (September 1991).
  • 8Belinda Mills Comparative Advertising - Should it be Allowed in the United Kingdom? 86 Trademark Rep. 174, p179.
  • 9American Home Care Products Com. v. Johnson & Johnson 577 F2d 160, 165 -66, 198 USPQ 132 (CA 2 1978).
  • 10Richard J. Leighton Materiality and Puffmg in Lanham Act False Advertising Cases: The Proofs , Presumptions, and Pretexts, The Trademark Reporter May - June, 2004.

同被引文献477

引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部