中国地方政府机构绩效考评目标模式研究被引量：30

导出

摘要现行中国地方政府机构绩效考评中存在的主要不足之处有:(1)主体笼统,监督乏力;(2)目的不明确,激励与约束机制不健全;(3)重形式,轻效果;(4)方法缺少科学性,制度化程度偏低。构建绩效考评模式,首先应该明确考评的目的、主体、方式和内容等基本问题。中国地方政府机构绩效考评指标体系,由服务质量、投入资源、产出结果、工作效率、遵纪守法和执行指令6项指标构成。考评模型的要点在于建立“绩效考评委员会”和制定“绩效管理条例”。

作者王建民

机构地区北京师范大学管理学院

出处《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第10期67-73,共7页 Journal of Management World

基金哈佛大学肯尼迪政府学院(KennedySchoolofGovernment KSG)任访问学者(Fellow 国家留学基金高级访问学者资助)期间的部分研究成果

关键词中国地方政府机构绩效考评考核模式考评主体

分类号 D630 [政治法律—中外政治制度]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1.《中国统计年鉴》[M].中国统计出版社,1989-2002年..
2This Act may be cited as the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.
3"To Provide for the Establishment of Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement in the Federal Government and for other Purposes" ,the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (www.whitehouse.gov/omb/mgmt-gpra/gplaw2m.html ).
4.[EB/OL].首都之窗主页www.beijing.gov.an,2005年5月12日.
5.[EB/OL].昌平区政府主页www.bjchp.gov.cn,2005年5月12日.
6Department of Management & Budget, 2004a, "Fairfax County Measures Up:A Manual for Performance Measurement",Eighth Edition, (From Harvard University Library e-resources, in January, 2005, at Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University).
7Department of Management & Budget, 2004b, "Fairfax County Measures for Results:A Guide to Advanced Performance Measurement", (From Harvard University Library e-resources, in January, 2005, at Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University).
8Department of Management & Budget, 2004c, "Fairfax County Manual for Data Collection for Performance Measurement", (From Harvard University Library e-resources, in January, 2005, at Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University).
9中华人民共和国统计局编.《中国统计年鉴·2004》[EB/OL].国家统计局网址(www.stats.gov.cn),2005年4月28日下载.
10王建民.美国地方政府绩效考评:实践与经验——以弗吉尼亚州费尔法克斯县为例[J].北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）,2005(5):107-111. 被引量：9

二级参考文献25

1吴建南.地方政府绩效评价与最佳管理实践研究[J].国家自然科学基金项目申请书,2002,(6).
2吴建南.国家科技基础条件平台政策法规规划报告——国外政策法规汇编[R].,2003(6)..
3Government Performance and Results Act, 1993.
4]Berry White, Seizing the moment on GPRA, Government Executive [ J ] , Jan. 2001.
5Bery A. Radin ,The Government Performance and Results Act and the Tradition of Federal. Management Reform:Square Pegs in Round Holes? Journal of Public Adminis tration Research and Theory [ J ] , Jan. 2000.
6Bery A. Radin,The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) : Hydra - headed monster or flexible management tool? Public Administration Review [ J ] , Jul.1998.
7Robert S. Kravchuk, Designing Effective Performance Measurement Systems under the Government Performance and Results Acts of 1993, Public Administration Review[ J] ,Jul. 1996.
8Bery A. Radin, Intergovemmental Relationships and the Federal Performance Movement, Public Administration Review[ J] ,Oct. 2000.
9Colleen OHara, GPRA Poses Problems, Federal Computer Week [ J ] , Jun 2001.
10Anne Laurent,The Results Act : Playing Chicken, Government Executive[ J] ,Jan 1998.