期刊文献+

土地调整、地权稳定性与农民长期投资激励 被引量:166

Land Reallocation,Tenure Security and Long-term Investment Incentive in China's Agricultural Production
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国的家庭联产承包责任制与农业经济增长之间的关系受到了众多经济学家的关注。现有研究普遍认为土地调整破坏了农民土地使用权的稳定性,从而削弱了农民的长期投资激励。本文将农户的长期投资划分为两类,“与特定地块不相连的长期投资”以及“与特定地块相连的长期投资”,通过实证研究发现,土地调整对农户的这两类长期投资决策的影响是不同的。本文的主要结论有:“减人减地”使农户的第一类长期投资大幅度下降,“增人增地”对农户的第一类长期投资没有什么影响;“减人减地”和“增人增地”对农户的农家肥使用量都没有什么影响。但是,我们并不能把“减人减地”导致的以及大调整所可能导致的第一类长期投资的减少完全归咎于土地调整所导致的低效率。 The goal of this paper is to study the relationships among the land reallocation, tenure security and long-term investment incentives in China's agricultural production. In this paper, the long-term investments are first classified into two categories: not-land-attached and land-attached. The empirical results show that the reduction of land due to small-scale reallocation of land do affect the first category of long-term investment which is decreased significantly, while the increase of land do not increase the first category accordingly. On the other hand, the changes of land, i.e., the security of land tenure, have no strong relationships with use of manures. The robust finding is that the low efficiency and development in agricultural production do not attribute to the comparatively frequent reallocation of land and poor land tenure determined by the Household Responsibility System.
作者 许庆 章元
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第10期59-69,共11页 Economic Research Journal
基金 澳大利亚国际农业研究中心(ACIAR)资助
关键词 土地调整 土地产权稳定性 长期投资激励 Land Reallocation Tenure Security Long-term Investment
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1姚洋.农地制度与农业绩效的实证研究[J].中国农村观察,1998(6):3-12. 被引量:295
  • 2Besley, T., 1995, "Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103(5), pp.903-937.
  • 3Brandit Loren, Jikun Huang, Guo Li and Scott Rozelle, 2002, "Land Rights in Rural China: Facts, Fictions and Issues," The China Journal, No.47, pp.67-97.
  • 4Brasselle, Anne-Sophie, Fr6d6ric Gaspart, Jean-Philippe, Platteau, 2002, "Land Security and Investment Incentives : Puzzling Evidence from Burkina Faso," Journal of Development Economics, Vol.67, pp. 373-418.
  • 5Carter Michael and Yao Yang, 1998, "Property Rights, Rental Markets, and Land in China," Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, working paper, University if Wisconsin-Madison.
  • 6Huang Jikun and Scott Rozellc, 1996, "Technological Change: Rediscovering the Engine of Productivity Growth in China's Rural Economy,"Journal of Development Economics, Vol.49, No. 2, PP. 337-367.
  • 7Krusekopf, Charles C., 2002, "Diversity in Land-tenure Arrangements under the Household Responsibility System in China," China Economic Review, Vol. 13, PP. 297-312.
  • 8Kung, J.K., 1995, "Equal Entitlement versus Tenure Security under a Regime of Collective Property Rights: Peasants' Performance for Institutions in Post-reform Chinese Agriculture," Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 82-111.
  • 9Kung, J. K., 2000, "Common Property Rights and Land Reallocations in Rural China: Evidence from a village Survey," World Development,Vol.28, pp. 701-719.
  • 10Li Guo, Scott Rozelle and Loren Brandt, 1998, "Tenure, land Rights, and Farmer Investment Incentives in China," Agricultural Economics,Vol. 19, pp. 63-71.

共引文献294

同被引文献2274

引证文献166

二级引证文献2842

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部