试析纪检口供的证据效力

Simple Analyse the Evidentiary Effect of the Inspect Discipline Oral Confession

当前,在查办贪污、贿赂、挪用公款等职务犯罪案件中,被告人翻供的情况比较突出。在此情况下,可否以纪检口供直接定案,成为司法实践中十分棘手的问题。通过考证现行立法及有关证据法理论,发现纪检口供并不具有刑事诉讼的证据能力,不能直接作为刑事诉讼证据。要解决这一司法难题,必须对现行反腐体制进行改进。

At present, in investigate and prosecute graft, corrupt, appropriating public funds this task sin cause, the circumstance of the appellee withdraw a confession is more outstanding. In the circumstances, can settle case directly with the Inspect Discipline Oral Confession, become the juridical practice in the very tough problem. The transit researches the current laws and the relevant testimony principle of law theories, detecting the Inspect Discipline Oral Confcasion not to have the credibility of the criminal action, can＇t be the criminal action evidence directly. To solve this judicial knot, must advance the improvement to the current fight corruption structure.