期刊文献+

经腹膈肌切开器械吻合治疗贲门癌 被引量:2

Treating Cardiac Carcinoma with Appliance Anastomose Via Diaphragm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价经腹膈肌切开器械吻合治疗贲门癌的效果。方法回顾分析作者1996年5月-2004年5月所完成的经腹膈肌切开器械吻合治疗贲门癌238例的围手术期经验,总结其手术方法对贲门癌患者带来的利弊。结果238例贲门癌手术切除234例(切除率98.3%),因广泛转移不能切除4例,所有切除者术后病检切端均无癌残留。术后发生肺部感染6例(2.5%),切口感染1例(0.4%),下肢深静脉血栓形成5例(2.1%),无吻合口漏和吻合口狭窄,无围手术期死亡。随访1年以上的病例230例(未切除者4例未列入随访范围),失访4例,其中1年生存率100%,3年生存率60.2%,5年生存率37.2%。所有随访病人中,返流性食道炎16例(7.0%)。结论经腹膈肌切开器械吻合治疗贲门癌创伤小,术后并发症少,不影响手术切除率及术后生存时间,对贲门癌患者是一种恰当的手术方法,尤其适用于有合并症的高龄患者。 Objective To evaluate the effect of treating cardiac carcinoma with appliance anastomose via diaphragm . Methods A retrospective review of the author' s perioperative period experience that 238 eases with cardiac carcinoma were treated by appliance anastomose via diaphragm performed from 1996 to 2004 . The advantages and disadvantages with this method for these patients were summarized. Results 238 cases were performed ( the resection rate was 98.3% ) , 4 cases couldn' t be performed for comprehensive metastasis. All the operations proved that the end of incisions have no carcinoma eell left by pathology. Pulmonary infection occurred in 6 cases (2.5%) , Infection of incision occurred in one case (0.4%) , Thrombus occurred in deep veins of lower limb in 5 cases (2. 1% ). No cases were found in anastomotic leak or anastomotic stenosis. Perioperative death occurred in no ease. 230 eases were followed up more than one year . 1,3,5 - year Survival rates were 100% ,60.2% , 37.2% respectively, GERD was occurred in 16 cases (7.0%). Conclcusion The method of treating cardiac carcinoma with appliance anastomose via diaphragm is safe,less complications after operation . this is a appropriate method, especially for advanced age with complications .
出处 《川北医学院学报》 CAS 2005年第3期288-289,共2页 Journal of North Sichuan Medical College
关键词 贲门癌 手术治疗 器械吻合 Cardiac carcinoma Surgical treatment Appliance anastomose
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1邵令方 李章才 等.210例早期食管癌和贲门癌的外科治疗[J].中华外科杂志,1981,19:259-259.
  • 2Clagett GP,Reisch JS.Prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgical patients.Results of meta-analysis[J].Ann Surg,1988,208:227-40.
  • 3Nurmohamed MT,Rosendaal FR,Buller HR,et al.Low molecular weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery:a meta-analysis[J].Lancet,1992,340-152-6.
  • 4Huang A,Barber N,Northeast A.Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis protocol-needs active enforcement[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2000,82:69-70.
  • 5Ramaswami G,Nicolaides AN.The cost-effectiveness of mechanical forms of DVT prophylaxis in general surgery[J].Inter Angiol,1996,15(Suppl):21-26.
  • 6Nicolaides AN,Breddin HK,Fareed J,et al.Prevention of venous thromboembolism[J].Inter Angiol,2001,20:1-37.
  • 7Mismetti P,Laporte S,Darmon J Y,et al.Meta-analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery[J].Br J Surg,2001,88:913-30.
  • 8Bergqvist D,Burmark US,Flordal PA,et al.Low molecular weight heparin started before surgery as prophylaxis against deep veins thrombosis:2500 versus 5000 XaI units in 2070 patients[J].Br J Surg,1995,82:496-501.
  • 9Hull RD,Pineo GF.Low-molecular-weight heparin in treatment of venous throboembolism[J].Inter Angiol 1998,17:131-4.
  • 10Kirchmaier CM,Wolf H,Schafter H,et al.Efficacy of a low molecular weight heparin administered intravenously or subcutaneously in comparison with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis[J].Inter Angiol,1998,17:135-45.

共引文献39

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部