期刊文献+

简单系统决策与复杂系统决策:对决策范式中分化和转换的一种理解 被引量:2

Simple System Decision & Complex System Decision: A Comprehension on the Diversity and Shift of Decision Paradigm
原文传递
导出
摘要 讨论了由规范决策(NP)到描述决策(DP)研究范式的分化问题。基于复杂性思维,分析了简单系统决策和复杂系统决策的区别;指出:基于NP/DP发展起来的决策理论实际上只对应简单决策系统范围。探讨了面向复杂决策系统(CDS)的新决策研究范式:复杂性范式(CP)的内涵;并把CP与NP/DP做了比较,指出在信念、学科基础、决策范围、方法论、理论体系上的一系列区别;最后提出了CP的体系架构。 First, we discuss the decision paradigm diversity from Normative Paradigm (NP) to Descriptive Paradigm (DP). Then based on the complexity thinking, we analyses the difference between Simple Decision System (SDS) and Complex Decision System(CDS), pointing out that the decision theory based on NP/DP is only effective within the scope of SDS. Further in this paper, we put forward a new conception: Complex Paradigm (CP), and systemically compares it with NP/DP inseveral points such as faith, discipline background, scope of application, methodology, etc. Finally we give out the structure frame of CP.
出处 《系统工程理论方法应用》 北大核心 2005年第5期418-423,共6页 Systems Engineering Theory·Methodology·Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70471086 70571069) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20040350719) 浙江省博士后择优资助基金资助项目(2004-bsh-034)
关键词 复杂决策系统 决策研究范式 系统方法论 复杂性范式 complex decision system (CDS) decision research paradigm system methodology(SM) complex paradigm (CP)
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Simon H A. Administration behavior: A study of decision-making process in administration organization[M]. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Ltd, 1976.
  • 2RussoJE 安宝生 徐联仓.决策行为分析[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1998..
  • 3Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of game and economic behavior[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944, 1994.
  • 4Hogarth R M. Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
  • 5Simon H A. The science of the artificial[M]. 2nd ed. The MIT Press, 1982.
  • 6Russo J E, Schoemaker P J H. Decision traps: Ten berries to brilliant and how to overcome them[M].NY: Firside, Simon & Schuste Inc, 1990.
  • 7Ramsay F P. Truth and probability, in ramsay[A].The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays[C]. Harcourt Brace, New York, 1931.
  • 8Payne J W. Bettman J R, Johnson E J. Adaptive strategy section in decision making[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1988,14: 534-552.
  • 9Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[J]. Science, 1981,211:453-458.
  • 10Waldrop M. Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos[M]. New York, Simon and Schuster, 1992.

二级参考文献38

共引文献1476

同被引文献36

  • 1张彩江,马庆国.简单决策与复杂决策的比较分析及其启发意义[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(2):101-104. 被引量:4
  • 2张彩江,马庆国.复杂性的定义,对象与层次问题:一个综述[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(6):644-650. 被引量:4
  • 3Russo,J.E.安宝生,徐联仓.决策行为分析[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1998:2—3,7.
  • 4Zhu, Z. Systems approaches: where the east meets the west [J ]. World Futures, 1997, (53) :253 - 276.
  • 5Mingers, J., Brocklesby, J. Multi-methodology : towards a framework for critical pluralism[J]. Systemist, 1996,18 : 101 - 131.
  • 6Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C, Creative problem solving : total systems intervention [ M ]. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1991 : 2 - 3.
  • 7Van Gigc, J. P. The paradigm of the science of management and of the management science disciplines[J]. Syst. Res., 2003, (20) :499 - 506.
  • 8Wakker, P. Luce's paradigm for decision under uncertainty [ J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2000, (44) :488 - 493.
  • 9Russo,J. E,Schoemaker, P. J. H. Decision traps: ten berries to brilliant and how to overcome them [ M ]. Firside, Simon & Schuste Inc. ,New York, 1990.
  • 10Morin, E. Science avec conscience[ M ]. Libraiheme Fayard, Editions du Seuil, 1990.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部