摘要
侵权法中的过错被分为故意和过失,侵权法对这两种过错形成的划分是基于一种对人的行为主观评判的态度,但这种评判在侵权法中却又是不彻底的,划分了故意和过失,最后却并不认真地将故意和过失归为不同的责任,仅笼统地称行为主观有过错,这样对于故意和过失引发责任的机理就被忽略了,而实际上,主观故意和过失所引发的责任机理是有区别的。
In the framework of liability fixation by fault, subjective fault is deemed as an indispensable factor of a liability of tort. Fault, in law of tort is divided into intention and negligence, the distinguish criterion between the two is the attitude in a person＇s activity, yet this criterion is not absolute： although intention and negligence are divided, it is not prudently differentiated between intention and negligence in fixing liabilities, but just mentioning the subjective fault exists. This, actually, lose the sight of the difference between intention and negligence in causing liability, which is not appropriate.
出处
《当代法学》
北大核心
2005年第6期29-34,共6页
Contemporary Law Review
基金
吉林大学社会科学研究项目:论侵权归责的过错推定
