期刊文献+

浅析由WTO贸易与环境争端所引发的理论争议 被引量:1

Theoretical Controversy Raised by WTO Trade-Environmental Disputes
原文传递
导出
摘要 有关贸易与环境争端在GATT法律体系内很难找到具体适用的规则,因此GATT曾被环保主义者称作没有规则的天堂。WTO成立后,为解决贸易与环境争端,出现了对WTO协定作普通法式解释的现象。本文认为这种解释方法符合客观要求,我国政府应顺应国际环保形势发展的总体需要,支持用普通法的方式解释WTO贸易与环境的相关法律规定。 Hardly any special rules on trade-environmental disputes could be found under GATT legal system. So, environmentalists call the GATT as environmental haven. After the establishment of the WTO, WTO agreements are interpreted in the common law style in order to solve trade - environmental disputes. This article recon that this method of interpretation meets the requirements of objective conditions, and the government of China should recognize the need of protecting the environment and support the way of interpreting WTO legal rules in the common law style.
作者 刘阳
机构地区 深圳大学法学院
出处 《当代法学》 北大核心 2005年第6期149-152,共4页 Contemporary Law Review
关键词 WTO规则 条约法 普通法解释 贸易与环境争端 海龟案 贸易与环境 WTO协定 争端 GATT 环保主义 WTO rules law of the treaties common law interpretation trade-environmental disputes Shrimp-Turtle Case
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1Raj Bhala, International Trade Law: Theory and Practice, p. 584(2d, ed. 2001).
  • 2Raj Bhala, The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decis in WTO Adjudication, 9 J. Transnat'l. 1. & Pol'y 1, p. 4(1999).
  • 3Robert Howse & Makau Mutua, Protecting Human Rights in a Global Economy: Challenges for the World Trade Organization (2000).
  • 4David Palmeter & Petros C Mavroidis, The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law, 92 Am. J Int'l L p. 398, p. 399( 1998).
  • 5Joost Pauwelyn, The Role of Public International Law in the WTO : How Far Can We Go? 95 Am. J Int'l L pp. 537 -539 (2001).
  • 6Bruno Simma, Self-Contained Regimes, 16 Neth. Y Bk. Int'l L. p. 111 (1985).
  • 7Louis Kaplow, Rules Versus Standards : An Economic Analysis, 42 Duke L J p. 557, pp. 559 - 560 (1992).
  • 8generally Robert E Hudec, The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy (2d ed. , 1990).
  • 9WTO Appellate Body Report on Japan -Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, AB - 1996 -2, WTO DS 8/AB/R p. 15 (Oct. 4,1996).
  • 10Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, Apr. 15, 1994, WTO Agreement, Annex 2, Legal Instruments, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (1994).

共引文献12

同被引文献7

  • 1王干.我国环境侵权民事责任制度的现状分析及完善[J].科技与法律,2005(3):116-120. 被引量:4
  • 2张坤明.可持续发展论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997..
  • 3“大陆沿海随时引爆生态灾难”(新加坡)联合早报[N].2005—12—12.
  • 4王洁明.瑞典企业追求“社会责任”促进可持续发展[EB/OL].SA8000.org.cn/123.html.
  • 5高桂林.公司环境责任研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2005.
  • 6杨荣珍.WTO争端解决-案例与评析[M].北京:对外经济贸易大学出版社,2001.
  • 7TED ease study[EB/OL]. www. American edu/projects/mandala/TED/hungry, html.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部