期刊文献+

关于高等学校科研评价问题的几点认识 被引量:9

Some Consideration on the Evaluation Problems of Scientific Research in High Institutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前学术研究方面一定程度存在的急功近利、浮躁浮夸等现象,不能简单地归结为科研评价问题.原因是多方面的,有些问题是因为与单位人事分配制度改革政策挂钩过紧引起的,需要各方面政策配套,采取措施综合治理.科研评价导向性强,既要重视,又要避免炒作,应当理性对待科研评价问题.科研评价应当坚持正确的评价导向,建立公开透明的评价机制,建立健全专家信誉制度,实行分类评价原则,对基地、项目、人才(团队)的评价要系统考虑,正确处理数量指标与质量指标的关系. Some problems in present academic research, such as eager for quick success and instant benefit, can not be attributed to evaluation problems of scientific research. There are various reasons on it, some have relation with personnel distribution system. In order to solve there problems, it is necessary to have all-around treatment. Evaluation of scientific research must persist in correct evaluative orientation, establishing outward and lucid evaluation system, and so on to systematically consider the base, objects, personnel and other factors in the evaluation, and correctly manager the relationship of quantitative and qualitative indices.
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第5期92-96,共5页 R&D Management
关键词 科研评价 高等学校 导向 机制 scientific reseach evaluation high institution orientation mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1Dr Fiona Q.Wood The Peer Review Process[A] January.
  • 21997 Simon Wessely. Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? Lancet1995.
  • 3Darly E.Chubin & Edward J.Hackett,Commentary:On the virtues of self-study,Technology,& Human Values, vol.14 No.1,Winter 1989.
  • 4National Science Foundation, http://www.nsf.gov/2003.
  • 5Recommendations of the Commission on Professional Self Regulation in Science,http://www.dfg.de/en/index.html 2003.
  • 6NIH Peer Review Notes 1996.10 ,http://www.drg.nih.gov/prnotes/oct96.htm#desk.
  • 7Rating of Grant Applications-NIH Announces New Explicit Statements of Review Criteria,http://www.siumed.edu/adraf/ratings.html 2003.
  • 8中科院综合计划局,中科院文献情报中心.经济合作与发展组织--巴黎"科学研究评价"[C].国际科技规划与战略选编[M].1999.
  • 9Scientific research evaluation:a review of methods and various contexts of their application[R]. Finland:evaluation of scientific research,1983.
  • 10连燕华,马晓光.评价要素系统结构分析及模型的建立[J].研究与发展管理,2000,12(4):17-20. 被引量:18

共引文献63

同被引文献55

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部