期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

公众参与技术决策模式的比较研究 被引量：4

A Comparative Research on the Models of Public Participation in Technological Decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在分析欧美国家当前普遍采用的四种公众参与技术决策模式的基础上,基于全体参与者职能与责任、参与者和管理者不同定位、信息与知识和技能要求、力量对比与决策结果等参量,对这四种模式进行了比较研究,揭示出各自的优势与缺陷,从而为我国公众参与技术决策模式的选择提供借鉴。 The partner selection is the key for an alliance to get sueceeding. In this paper, on the basis of analyzing the principles and index system of partner selection in technical standard strategic alliance, we apply AHP to solve the problem of how to select alliance partner.
作者 张慧敏
机构地区 哈尔滨工业大学人文学院
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第11期47-51,共5页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
关键词 公众参与 技术决策 实践模式 technical standard cooperative R＆D partner selection AHP
分类号 G301 [文化科学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1张慧敏,陈凡.论技术决策中的公众参与[J].科学学研究,2004,22(5):476-481. 被引量：6
  • 2J. Chopyak, P. Levesque. Public Participation in Science and Technology Decision Making: Trends for the Future[J]. Technology in Society. vol.23, 2002(4): 159.
  • 3Frank N. Laird. Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making[J]. Science, Technology,and Human Values. vol.18, 2001(3): 341-361.
  • 4Renn Ortwin, Thomas Webler and Peter Wiedemann (eds).Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1995:56.
  • 5Iris Marion Young. Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy[C]. Democracy and Difference:Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Seyla Benhabib(ed.).Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.1996:25-29.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Nelkin D. Science, technology and democratic Process [A].Albert H T, et al. Technology and Man's Future [C]. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1981. 79-86.
  • 2Trachtman L E. Science and technology: who governs? [A], Goggin M L. Governing Science And Technology In A Democracy [C]. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1986. 156-167.
  • 3Goorden L. Finding a balance between technological innovation and deliberation: lessons from Belgian Public Forum on biotechnology [A]. Proceedings of Session "New Forms of Citizen Participation in Technology Policy: European Perspectives" at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association [C]. Philadelphia, 2003. 3-5.
  • 4James D W. DNA folly continues[A]. New Republic[C].New York: Plenum Press, 1979. 14-15.
  • 5Laird F N. Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making [J]. Science, Technology and Human Values, 1993. 341-361.
  • 6Lockwood B. Distributive politics and the costs of centralization [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2002, (69): 313-337.
  • 7Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse [M]. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
  • 8Chopyak J, Levesque P. Public participation in science and technology decision making:trends for the Future [J]. Technology in Society, 2002, (24): 159.
  • 9Sclove R, Scammell M, Holland B. Community based Research in the U S: An Introductory Reconnaissance [M]. MA: The Loka Institute, 1998. 24-25.
  • 10Einsiedel E F, Jelsoe E, Breck T. Publics at the technology table: the consensus conference in Denmark [J]. Public Understanding Sci, 2001, (10): 1-16.

共引文献5

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

科学学与科学技术管理
2005年 第11期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部