期刊文献+

不同类型高血压病患者脑血管血液动力学参数指标比较

Comparison of cerebral vascular hemodynamic indexes in patients with different types of hypertensive disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过测量高血压病患者脑血管血液动力学的指标,探讨其与脑血管血液动力学的差异。 方法:选择2004-08/2005-02在福建省级机关医院门诊就诊的原发性高血压病患者160例,男87例,女73例。按高血压的类型分为单项高血压组61例和双项高血压组99例。应用脑血管血流动力学检测仪检测平均脑血流量、平均脑血流速度、最大脑血流速度、最小脑血流速度、外周阻力,特性阻抗、脉搏波波速、动态阻力、临界压、舒张压与临界压差值。比较两组间脑血管血液动力学指标的差异。 结果:160例均进入结果分析。①脑血流量比较:左侧双项高血压组明显高于单项高血压组(9.38±2.13,8.87±1.58,P<0.05)。②最小脑血流速度比较:右侧单侧高血压组明显低于双项高血压组(7.42±2.76,8.39±2.58,P<0.05)。③左右侧双项高血压组舒张压与临界压的差值明显高于单项高血压组[左侧(2.49±094,2 11±0.66),右侧(2.53±0.95,2.13±0.79),P<0.05]。 结论:双项高血压组的脑血管血液动力学指标异常程度显著高于单项高血压组(除外右侧最小脑血流速度)。提示在临床工作中应加重双项 高血压病患者血压水平的调控。 AIM: To probe into the differences between indexes and cerebral vascular hemodynamics by the measurement of cerebral vascular hemodynamic indexes in patients with hypertensive disease. METHODS: 160 patients with essential hypertension, who were treated at the out-patient clinic of Fujian Provincial Institution Hospital from August 2004 to February 2005, were selected, including 87 males and 73 females. They were divided into monomial hypertension group with 61 patients and twofold hypertension group with 99 patients according to the type of hypertension. The mean cerebral blood flow (mCBF), mean cerebral blood flow velocity (mCBFV), maximum cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFVmax), minimum cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFVmin), peripheral resistance (Rv), characteristic impedance (Zcv), pulse wave velocity (Wv), DR, critical pressure (CP), difference value between diastolic pressure (DP) and CP were detected with cerebral vascular hemodynamic apparatus. The differences of cerebral vascular hemodynamic indexes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: 160 patients were all involved in the result analysis. ① Comparison of CBF: It was higher obviously in the twofold hypertension group than that in the monomial hypertension group in the left side (9.38±2.13,8.87±1.58,P 〈 0.05). ② Comparison of CBFVmin: It was lower obviously in the monomial hypertension group than that in the twofold hypertension group in the fight side (7.42±2.76,8.39±2.58,P 〈 0.05). ③ The difference between DP and CP in the twofold hypertension group was significantly higher than that in the monomial hypertension group in the left and right sides [left side: (2.49±0.94,2.11 ±0.66), right side: (2.53± 0.95,2.13±0.79),P 〈 0.05]. CONCLUSION: The abnormality of cerebral vascular hemodynamic indexes in the twofold hypertension group is significantly higher than that in the monomial hypertension group (except CBFVmin in the right side). It is indicated that the adjustment of blood pressure in patients with twofold hypertensive disease should be stressed in the clinical work.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第35期66-67,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献12

  • 1王桂清 郭佐 樊舜英 柳兆荣 陈君楷 吴望一.从正常到中风脑血管血流动力学的变化规律[A].柳兆荣,陈君楷,吴望一.生物力学新近展[M].成都:成都科学技术大学出版社,1996.255-8.
  • 2Bonita R. Epidemiological studies and the prevention of skroke[ J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 1994,4(Suppl 1) :2-10.
  • 3Gimbrone MA Jr, Topper JN, Nagel T, et al. Endothelial dysfunction,hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2000,902: 230-239.
  • 4Kleinstreuer C, Hyun S, Buchanan JR Jr, et al. Hemodynamic parameters and early initial thickening in branching blood vessels[J]. Crit Rev Biomed Eng,2001,29:1-64.
  • 5郭佐,王桂清,何广成,等.脑血管血流动力学参数的主要成分分析和脑血管功能的综合评估[A].柳兆荣.生物力学新进展[M].成都:成都科技大学出版,1996.260-264.
  • 6Gotlieb AI. Smooth muscle and endothelial cell function in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis[J]. Can Med Assoc J, 1982, 1.26:903-908.
  • 7张慧,刘树文,聂淑敏.高血压病颅内动脉脑血流动力学研究[J].滨州医学院学报,2001,24(1):10-11. 被引量:2
  • 8马骁,黎莉,张薇,宋平,宗学奎,郎冬梅,马金鹏,韩志双,孙丽萍.高血压患者颈动脉粥样硬化与血流动力学改变的关系研究[J].高血压杂志,2002,10(4):317-319. 被引量:13
  • 9王桂清,黄久仪.脑血管血液动力学检测在卒中预防中的应用[J].中华流行病学杂志,2002,23(4):308-311. 被引量:46
  • 10王桂清,沈凤英,等.脑出血和脑梗死患者血液动力学检测比较[J].中华国际医学杂志,2001,1(6):509-511. 被引量:10

共引文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部