期刊文献+

关键期假说研究综述 被引量:6

Summary of Critical Period Hypothesis(CPH)Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自从Lenneberg提出语言学习的关键期假说以来,围绕关键期是否存在,学术界争论不断,形成支持与反对的两种截然不同的观点。文章介绍两种不同观点中有代表性学者的观点及关键期假说理论的最新研究成果,从中得到儿童早期外语学习的启示。 Since the CPH was put forward by Lennebarg,the argument on whether CPH exists has not stopped,which has led both proponents and opponent of CPH. The article here introduces the representative viewpoints from both parties and the newly developed achievement. The article can also present some inspiration of children foreign language learning.
作者 黄怀飞
出处 《泉州师范学院学报》 2005年第5期124-126,130,共4页 Journal of Quanzhou Normal University
关键词 关键期 二语习得 Lenneberg CPH second language acquisition Lenneberg
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Lemeberg EH. Biological foundation of language [M]. New York Wiley 1967.
  • 2Birdsong D. Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis [M]. Mahwah: Lawrence ErLibaum 1999.
  • 3Rod Ellis. The study of second language acquisition [M]. 上海外语出版社 1999.
  • 4Krashen SD. Principle and practice in second language acquisition [M]. Prentice Hall Itnernational ltd 1987.
  • 5Patkowski MS. Age and accent in a second language: A reply to James Flege[J]. Applied Linguistics 11:1,73-89.
  • 6Johnson J,Newport E.Critical period effects in second language learning,the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language[J]. Cognitive Psychology 21,60-99.
  • 7Snow C, Hoefnagel-hohle M. The critical period for language acquisition : Evidence from second language learning[J].Child Development 49,1114- 1128.

同被引文献84

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部