期刊文献+

焊管与无缝管的经济研究 被引量:4

Study on Economy Consideration Between Welded and Seamless Pipe
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用一套φ114mm高频焊管机组与一套φ114mm斜轧穿孔──顶管──张力减径机组两种工艺方式同时生产管径32~114mm,壁厚小于6mm的流体输送管、结构管、低中压锅炉管和J55石油油管,在两套机组都不考虑热处理和管加工的条件下,进行主要消耗指标和不同供坯方式下生产费用的比较。得出:①靠外购坯料生产钢管的厂家,其经济性最终取决于热轧钢卷和管坯的差价,二者价格越接近越有利于焊管。②对使用自产管坯的厂家,在生产壁厚小于6mm钢管时,一般焊管费用低。③无缝管轧机生产壁厚大于6mm的无缝钢管比较经济。 Two mills, φ114mm high frequency welding pipe mill and φ114mm tilt roll passing-braving pipe reducing tension mill, produced simultaneously the pipes with φ32- 114mm less than 6mm in thickness, as forfluid transportation pipe, structure pipe, low and medium pressure boiler pipe and J55 petroleum pipe. Themain consumption and producing expense with different offering blank way were compared with two millswithout considering heat -treatment and pipe machining. The result are: 1. to the pipe manufacturer purchasing blank, the economy consideration was finally decided by balance of expenses between hot- rolledsteel coil and pipe blank. More nerely the two expenses was, more advantageous the welded pipe. 2. to thepipe manufacturer using self-produced pipe blank, the expense of welded pipe less than 6mm in thicknesswas lower. 3. the seamless pipe can not be replaced by the welded pipe in economy consideration as the thickness is more than 6mm.
出处 《焊管》 1996年第2期1-4,共4页 Welded Pipe and Tube
关键词 焊管 无缝管 经济性 对比 welded pipe seamless pipe economy consideration comparing
  • 相关文献

同被引文献11

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部