期刊文献+

中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表的信度与效度分析 被引量:126

Reliability and validity of Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center Standard Aphasia Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究“中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表”(CRRCAE)在评测脑血管疾病失语症患者中的信度和效度。方法运用CRRCAE量表对20例失语症患者进行量表的信度和效度分析,引用组内相关系数(interclass correlation coeffi-cients)表示量表的可信度;将CRRCAE量表的总分和分项目测验同西方失语症量表(Western Aphasia Battery,WAB)的失语症指数和分测验进行量表的效度研究。结果CRRCAE量表总评分组内相关系数>0.9;CRRCAE的总评分同WAB的失语症指数有较高的相关性(r=0.948,P<0.01);其敏感效应尺度为0.94。结论CRRCAE具有良好的信度和敏感度,其总分在反映失语症严重程度方面具有较好的有效性,可以作为在失语症患者的临床和语言康复中量化的指标。 Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center Standard Aphasia Examination (CRRCAE) among patients with aphasia after cerebral injury. Methods 40 patients were measured using the CRRCAE. For reliability, interclass correlation coefficients were analyzed. For validity, the correlation coefficients of the aphasia quotients and 4 items of CRRCAE and Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) were analyzed. Results The interclass correlation coefficients〉0. 9, while the Cronbach a of total scale was 0. 9411, the scale of the comprehension was 0.8677, the scale of express was 0. 8889. CRRCAE had positive relationship with WAB(with the aphasia quotients, r=0. 948, P〈0.01 ). The effect size statistics scale was 0.94. Conclusion CRRCAE shows a good retest reliability and good internal consistency. The total scale of CRRCAE can be correlated with serious level of aphasia effectively.
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 2005年第9期703-705,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基金 中国康复研究中心科研基金(2003-5)。
关键词 中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表 失语症 信度 效度 Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center Standard Aphasia Examination (CRRCAE) aphasia reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1高素荣.失语症[M].北京:北京医科大学协和医科大学联合出版社,1992.26.
  • 2胡超群.汉语失语症测评法[M].中国科学院心理研究所,1990..
  • 3朱镛连.神经康复学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2001,5.2-11,20-21.
  • 4SEYMOUR DG,BALL AE,RUSSELL EM,et al. Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities.The reliability and validity of the SF-36 and the effect of cognitive impairment[J].J Eval Clin Pract,2001,7(4):411.
  • 5HOBART JC,LAMPING DL,FREEMAN JA,et al. Evidence based measurement:which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation[J].Neurology,2001,57(4):639.
  • 6KUCUKDEVECI AA,YAVUZER G,ELHAN AH,et al. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey[J].Clin Rehabil,2001,15(3):311.
  • 7DAVING Y,ANDREN E,NORDHOLM L,et al. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure[J].Clin Rehabil,2001,15(3):301.
  • 8COHEN ME,MARINO RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2000,81(12):21.
  • 9SCHINDL MR,FORSTNER C,KERN H,et al. Evaluation of a German version of the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) in acute and chronic stroke patients[J].Eur J Neurol,2000,7(5):523.
  • 10 Harold Goodglass, Edith Kaplan.Aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1983

共引文献287

同被引文献1152

引证文献126

二级引证文献658

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部