期刊文献+

社会危害性与刑事违法性辨析——重在从“罪刑法定”视角观之 被引量:8

Differentiation between the Social Harmfulness and the Criminal Illegality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一个时期以来,社会危害性与刑事违法性的争论越来越引起人们的极大关注。社会危害性与刑事违法性是属于两个不同学科、不同领域的问题。在“罪刑法定”原则下,社会危害性更应当回归于犯罪学之中,而在刑法学中用法益侵害和严重的法益侵害取而代之,并且它们只有被明确规定在刑法中才能叫刑法法益侵害。这样规定,不仅剔除了“社会危害性”这一宏观、模糊的、甚至易受主观价值取向改变的犯罪定义标准,而且有利于刑事司法操作。 For a certain period, the dispute between social harmfulness and criminal transgression arouses great conceres from people more and more. Social harmfulness and criminal transgression are two questions of different disciplines and different fields. Under the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, the social harmfulness should come back in criminology even more. It is replaced by aggression and serious aggression of legal interests in criminal jurisprudence, but they are criminal aggressions of legal interests only stipulated clearly in criminal law. The stipulating like this, not only helps to reject the criminal defining standard, which is macroscopic, fuzzy and even apt to change with the subjective value orientation, but also helps the criminal administration of justice to be operated.
作者 李晓明 陆岸
机构地区 苏州大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第6期37-46,共10页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 社会危害性 刑事违法性 罪刑法定原则 犯罪定义 “罪刑法定”原则 法益侵害 定义标准 价值取向 司法操作 犯罪学 social harmfulness criminal illegality legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime crime's definition
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献16

共引文献636

同被引文献53

引证文献8

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部