5Lax SF, Kurman RJ, Pizer ES, et al. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2000, 24: 1201-8.
6Taylor RR, Zeller J, Lieberman RW, et al. An analysis of two versus three grades for endometrial carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1999, 74: 3-6.
7Scholten AN,Creutzberg CL,Noordijk EM.Long-term outcome in endometrial carcinoma favors a two-instead of a three-tiered grading system[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,52:1067-74.
8Alkushi A, Abdul-Rahman ZH, Lim P, et al. Description of a novel system for grading of endometrial carcinoma and comparison with existing grading systems[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2005, 29: 295-304.
10Ayhan A, Taskiran C, Yuce K, Kucukail T. The prognostic value of nuclear grading and the revised FIGO grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma[J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2003, 22: 71-4.
