摘要
研究表明,经皮加压钢板固定(PCCP)和髋螺钉固定(HS)在治疗髋部骨折相比较的结果各式各样。研究结果推荐PCCP,因为它需求的平均输血量较低,术后疼痛较轻。PCCP和HS两种治疗方法的置入失败率都很低。然而,置入失败和二次手术在PCCP组可能更为常见。额外的随机对照实验可以被用来检验这些结果。
Studies suggest that outcomes comparing percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) and hip screw (HS) for treatment of hip fractures are varied. Outcomes favoring PCCP include lower mean blood transfusion requirements and slightly lower postoperative pain. Both PCCP and HS are associated with low rates of implant failure, however, in the PCCP group implant failure and unplanned reoperations may be more common. Additional randomized controlled trials are recommended to verify these results.
出处
《中华创伤骨科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2005年第10期975-980,共6页
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma