期刊文献+

栗疫菌弱毒力的转化及转化菌株的毒力测定 被引量:2

Transmission of Cryphonectria hypovirulence and virulence test of the transmitted isolates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用配对转化和室内、大田接种的方法研究栗疫菌低毒力的传递和生防潜力。从12个配对菌株中得到了6个转化菌株,不同的dsRNA供体菌和受体菌配对转化的效率不同,转化率从0到100%不等。室内枝段接种和大田接种测定的毒力表明,6个转化菌株、12个供体菌株、6个不能转化的受体菌+供体菌、6个转化菌株+供体野生型菌株处理的相对毒力都在80%以下,4者之间没有显著性差异,比12个受体菌和12个供体野生型菌株的毒力都低,表现弱毒力或中等毒力。前4者与后2者的差异都达到极显著水平,而供体野生型菌株的毒力(相对毒力72.73%-108.69%)与受体菌的毒力差异不显著。实验表明低毒力菌株的生防潜力比预期的高。 The efficiency of dsRNA transmission in Cryphonectria parasitica was tested by co-culture the dsRNA donor and recipient, and virulence of dsRNA-containing isolates was determined by inoculation in both laboratory and field. Results showed that the transmission rate ranged from 0 to 100% within different combinations. The data of relative virulence tested by inoculation indicated that the virulence of 6 transmitted isolates, 12 donors, 6 pairs of non-transmitted isolates, and 6 pairs of transmitted isolate & wild type of the parent were extremely lower than that of recipient and wild type of donor. They were hypovirulent or mid-virulent, and no significant difference was observed among them. The wild type of donor possesses comparative virulence to recipient, which exhibited high virulence. The results suggested that the potentiality of the biological control for chestnut blight was higher than our expectation based on the assay data.
出处 《果树学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第6期673-677,共5页 Journal of Fruit Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30370918 30470062)。
关键词 栗疫菌 低毒力传递 供体菌 受体菌 转化率 相对毒力 Cryphonectria parasitica Hypovirulence transmission Donor Recipient Transmission rate Relative virulence
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Heiniger U, Rigling D. Biological control of chestnut blight in Europe[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1994, 32:581-599.
  • 2Anaguostakis SL. Chestnuts and the introduction of chestnut blight[R]. Report of North-American Nut Growers's Association, 1992,83:39-42.
  • 3王克荣,邵见阳,陆家云.苏皖地区栗疫病菌营养体亲和性研究[J].南京农业大学学报,1991,14(4):44-48. 被引量:26
  • 4Liu YC, Milgroom MG. Correlation between hypovirus transmission and the number of vegetative incompatibility (vic) genes different among isolates from a natural population of Cryphonectria parasitica[J]. Phytopathology, 1996, 86:79-86.
  • 5Cortesi P, McCulloch CE, Song H, et al. Genetic control of horizontal virus transmission in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica[J]. Genetics, 2001, 159:107-118.
  • 6王克荣,成桂英,刘怡君,M.G.米格鲁姆.栗疫病菌的营养体亲和性基因和dsRNAs对病毒传播的影响[J].菌物系统,1997,16(1):30-35. 被引量:12
  • 7Bissegger M, Rigling D, Heiniger U. Population structure and disease development of Cryphonectria parasitica in European chestnut forests in the presence of natural hypovirulence[J]. Phytopathology,1997, 87:50-59.
  • 8王克荣,邵见阳,陆家云.栗疫病菌的致病力分化[J].果树科学,1993,10(1):25-28. 被引量:11
  • 9Van Alfen NK, Jaynes RA, Bowman JT. Stability of Endothia parasitica hypovirulence in culture[J]. Phytopathology, 1978, 68:1075-1079.

二级参考文献7

共引文献39

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部