期刊文献+

历史地辩证地认识、评价和运用“六书说” 被引量:1

A historical and dialectic cognition,evaluation and application of the Six Scripts theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 要说明的问题有三点:(1)辩证地认识“六书”定义的内涵与外延,历史地说明传统“六书”理论的得与失;(2)采取更加达观的态度认识“六书”造字说与“四体两用”说的联系与区别;(3)人文学科不能完全用科学方法来说明,正确把握未来汉字构形研究的导向。 This article is intended to account for three points: (1) One should have a dialectic understanding of the connotations and extensions of the Six Scripts, and have a historical explanation of the gain and loss of the traditional Six Scripts theory. (2) One should have a more philosophical attitude toward the relationship between the Six Scripts word-formation theory and the Four Scripts and Two Usage theory. (3) Humanistic studies cannot mechanically be described via scientific methodologies, and nor can the study of the form of Chinese characters.
作者 苏宝荣 李智
机构地区 河北师范大学
出处 《河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2005年第6期69-72,共4页 Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 历史辩证的观点 “六书”造字说 “四体两用”说 汉字的人文性 historical and dialectic viewpoints Six Scripts word-formation Four Scripts and Two Usage humanistic nature of Chinese characters
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1段玉裁.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981..
  • 2王筠.说文释例[M].北京:中国书店,1983..
  • 3裘锡圭.文字学概要[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996..
  • 4章太炎.中国现代学术经典·章太炎卷[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1996..
  • 5陈梦家.殷墟卜辞综述[M].北京:科学出版社,1956.533.
  • 6杨薇.浅议假借造字兼及“三书说”[J].古汉语研究,2000(3):32-34. 被引量:6

共引文献731

同被引文献3

  • 1汉语大字典编辑委员会编.汉语大字典[M]. 湖北辞书出版社, 1992
  • 2赵 诚编著.甲骨文简明词典[M]. 中华书局, 1988
  • 3(汉)许慎 撰,(清)段玉裁 注.说文解字注[M]. 上海古籍出版社, 1981

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部