期刊文献+

中国外贸法限制知识产权滥用措施制度研究 被引量:5

Study on the System of Regulating the Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights in Foreign Trade Law of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 知识产权滥用行为不仅会对被许可人的利益造成不正当的侵害,而且会危害贸易秩序,阻碍技术的传播和发展。因此,对其进行规制是国际上的普遍做法。TRIPS 协定在几个条文中都作了限制知识产权滥用的规定。加入世界贸易组织以后,我国对《对外贸易法》进行了修改,在对外贸易法第30条中对知识产权滥用行为规定了限制措施。该规定与 TRIPS 协定的内容是一致的。这是我国第一次在法律层面上就该问题作出规定,对我国知识产权制度的发展具有重要意义。 An abuse of intellectual property rights (IPRs) not only violates the interests of licensees but also harms the foreign trade order and impedes the dissemination and development of technology. Thus, it is internationally accepted that the abuse should be regulated. There are several articles in the TRIPs Agreement prescribing the abuse of IPRs. After China's entry into the WTO, the Foreign Trade Law was amended and measures to restrict the abuse of IPRs were incorporated in its Article 30. The content of Article 30 is consistent with the relevant regulations of TRIPS Agreement. It is the first time that the abuse of intellectual property is regulated in law level and it is believed that this article will promote the development of intellectual property system in China.
作者 郭寿康 万勇
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第5期100-106,共7页 The Jurist
关键词 中国 TRIPS协定 知识产权滥用措施制度 《对外贸易法》 《国际技术转让行动守则》 An abuse of intellectual property rights TRIPS Agreement Foreign Trade Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1.联大第3202(S—Ⅵ)号决议第4节[Z].,..
  • 2郭寿康.《国际技术转让》[M].法律出版社,1988年版.第212页.
  • 3Carlos M Correa & Abdulqawi A Yusuf (ed.), Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement, London-The Hague-Boston, Kluwer Law International 1998, p.270,286.
  • 4Michael Blakeney, Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Concise Guide to the TRIPS Agreement, London, Sweet&Maxwell, 1996,p.108.
  • 5Thomas Cottier, The Prospects for Intellectual Property in GATT, 28 Common Market Law Review (1991) p.262.
  • 6See Thomas Cottier, The Prospects for Intellectual Property in GATT, 28 Common Market Law Review (1991), p.383-414.
  • 7Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property, Section 3.2.2.
  • 8Daniel Gervais: The TRIPS Agreement, Drafting History and Analysis (2nd edition), Sweet & Maxwell Publication 2003, p.281.
  • 9Morton Salt Co.v.G.S.Suppiger, 314 U.S.488. 86 L.Ed.363, 62 S.Ct.402 (1972).
  • 10Lasercomb America, Inc. v.Reynolds, 911 F.2d 970 (4th Cir. 1990).

引证文献5

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部