期刊文献+

330例危重病患者临床特点分析 被引量:2

Analysis on the Clinical Characteristics of 330 Patients with Severe Emergency Diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨危重病患者临床特点,分析其预后因素.方法:回顾性收集总结在我院急诊ICU住院的资料完整的危重症患者330例,分析其临床特点、诊治主要指标、预后情况及其影响因素.结果:(1)330例患者中,死亡组(N=108)比存活组(N=222),昏迷者较多及程度较重,白蛋白减低,C反应蛋白(CRP)升高,APACHEⅡ评分高(P<0.002~0.0001).(2)死亡组比存活组多系统功能损害发生率高.(3)老年患者比非老年人白蛋白及血红蛋白(Hb)减低,高血压、感染及多系统损害出现率高.(4)主要死亡病因包括:脑梗死、多系统功能损害、休克、心力衰竭及脑出血等.(5)多元回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分与预后不良呈正比.结论:危急重症患者要重视多项预后评估,危险分层,以指导临床救治. Objective:Toinvestigate the clinical Characteristics of severe emergency diseases and its prognosis. Method: Three hundreds and thirty patients with severe emergency diseases were included and whose Clinical Characteristics and prognosis factors were analyzed retrospectively.Results: (1) In 330 cases, compared with survival group (n = 222), there were higher pravelenee rates of coma, c - reactive protein(CRP) and APACHE Ⅱ's score increased, as well as plasma albumin decreased in death group (n = 108) (P 〈 0. 002 ~0. 001 ). (2) There were more cases of multi - organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in death group than survival. (3) Compared with non - elderly cases, there were higher pravelence rates of hypertension, infection and MODS, as well as albumin and hemoglobin decrease in death group. (4) Main dead causes included as following: cerebral infarction, MODS, Shook, heart failure and cerebral hemorrhage etc. (5) By using of multi - variate regression analysis, it was showed that Apache Ⅱ score correlated to prognosis positively and had certain predictive vatue. Conclusion: It should pay more attention to prognosis assessment, risk stratification and management effectively in cases of severe emergency diseases.
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2005年第5期352-353,355,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

共引文献330

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部