摘要
《史记》“太史公曰”的文体分为序论、赞论和论传三种,对它们的界定与归类理应从文体的角度去追溯源流,而不是从“太史公曰”所处篇中位置的前后来予以划分。只有这样,我们才能对《史记》一书中纷纭复杂的“太史公曰”有更为明晰的认识。
The styles of “Historiographer Sima' words”can be divided into three: the comments of preface, the summaries and the comments of biographies. The paper advances that the styles should be based on the definition and category but not the positions of “Historiographer Sima' words”. Thus, we have a better understanding about it.
出处
《渭南师范学院学报》
2005年第6期13-15,共3页
Journal of Weinan Normal University
关键词
“太史公日”
序论
赞论
论传
“Historiographer Sima's words”
comments of preface
summaries
comments of biographies