期刊文献+

修辞学民族性特点溯源

Tracking down National Characteristics of Rhetoric
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过对比的方法,讨论中国古代修辞学传统与西方古典修辞学传统的民族性特点。中国修辞学的实践重“文辞”、轻“语辞”;而西方古典修辞学起源于演讲论辩,与“语辞”有着紧密的联系。中国产生“官学”、“官制”的封建专制的社会条件,即民主思想和制度的缺失,对中国修辞学重“文辞”、轻“语辞”的倾向有明显的影响,导致了中西方修辞学传统之异。认清这个问题对于中国修辞学的未来发展有一定指导意义。 The distinctions on national characteristics between traditional Ancient Chinese Rhetoric and western Classical Rhetoric are deduced through comparisons. Ancient Chinese Rhetoric paid more attention to text than discourse while western Classical Rhetoric focus on speech, which is firmly concerned with the study of discourse. Confucianism and Keju, official study and official selection system, the outcome of feudal autarchy is the historical situation for the trend of Chinese Rhetoric while democracy is the reason of western trend. With the change of the society the prospective rhetoric study is foreseen.
作者 欧阳旭
出处 《湖南科技学院学报》 2005年第10期105-108,共4页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Engineering
关键词 中西方传统修辞学 语辞 文辞 民族性特点 traditional Ancient Chinese Rhetoric and western Classical Rhetoric text discourse national characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1常昌富.导论:20世纪修辞学概述[A].肯尼斯·博克等(常昌富,顾宝桐译).当代西方修辞学:演讲和话语批评[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
  • 2陈光磊,王俊衡.中国修辞学通史:先秦两汉魏晋南北朝卷[M].长春:吉林教育出版社,1998.
  • 3罗念生.修辞学·导言[A].亚里士多德(罗念生译).修辞学[M].北京:三联书店,1991:2.
  • 4温科学.论当代英美修辞学的演变[J].外语教学,2002,23(4):22-27. 被引量:5
  • 5凌德祥.世纪之交的中国修辞学[J].南京社会科学,1997(8):72-76. 被引量:1

二级参考文献20

  • 1胡宗哲.八部近编《现代汉语》教材中修辞(语用)部分的比较——兼论教材的改革趋势[J].当代修辞学,1996(1):30-32. 被引量:1
  • 2Aristotle. Rhetoric[M]. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts.New York: Modern Library, 1954.
  • 3Benson, Thomas W. (eds.). Speech Communication in the 20th Century[C]. Carbonale: South Illinois University Press, 1985.
  • 4Bizzell, Patricia and Herzberg, Bruce. The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present[M]. Boston: Bedford Books of ST. Martin's Press, 1990.
  • 5Bosmajan, Haig A. (eds.). The Rhetoric of Nonverbal Communication[C]. IL: Scott, Foreman and Company,1970.
  • 6Bosmajan, Haig A. (eds.). The Rhetoric of Civil Rights Movement[C]. New York: Random House Inc. ,1969.
  • 7Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives [M]. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1950.
  • 8Burke, Kenneth. Rhetoric-Old and New[A]. In Martin Steinmann, Jr. (eds.). New Rhetorics[C].New York: Scriber's Sons,1967.
  • 9Burke, Kenneth. Language as Symbolic Action[M].Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.
  • 10Conley, Thomas M. Rhetoric in the European Tradition[M]. The University of Chicago Press, 1990.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部