摘要
胡绳晚年,以民粹主义问题为切入点,对毛泽东新民主主义论所作的再评价,在中国现代思想史的研究中具有借鉴价值。在批判民粹主义问题上,陈独秀与毛泽东可说是殊途同归。陈独秀运用“二次革命”论批判民粹主义,而毛泽东所凭借的则是新民主主义论。这两个理论虽有原则区别,但在与民粹主义划清界限的问题上却达成了共识。这是因为,二者在对待资本主义的态度、主张有间断的革命和最终的革命目标等方面,见解相似,结论相近。我们应从这一角度对陈之“二次革命”论进行再评价。
In his later years, Hu Sheng started with Narodnikism and recommented on Mao Zedong' s theory, of New Democracy, which can be used for reference in researches into the history of contemporary Chinese ideology. So to speak, Chen Duxiu and Mao Zedong reached the same goal by different routes while criticizing the problem of Narodnikism. Chen Duxiu applied the theory of “Two-Time Revolution” to criticize Narodnikism, while what Mao Zedong relied on was the theory of New Dermocracy, Though there were differences in principle in the very two theories, they had something in common in making a clean break with Narodnikism, for their opinions and conclusions were the same on their attitudes towards capitalism, interruptive revolution and the final revolutionarv goal, etc. We should recomment on Chen Duxiu's “Two-Time revolution” from this angle.
出处
《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2005年第5期35-40,共6页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
陈独秀
民粹主义
“二次革命”论
新民主主义论
Chen Duxiu
Narodnikism
the theory of “Two-Time Revolution”
the theory of New Democracy