期刊文献+

不同缝合方式对痔切除术切口愈合影响的临床观察 被引量:1

Clinical Observation of the Healing of hemorrhoidectomy Wound Using Different Suture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨缩短痔切除术的切口愈合时间。方法:150例痔切除术患者随机分为3组,A组50例行间断褥式外翻缝合痔术后切口,B组50例行单纯间断缝合痔术后切口,C组50例以开放切口处理。结果:A组患者切口愈合时间平均为(12.6±3.1)d,短于B组的(16.4±5.3)d和C组的(16.6±2.9)d(P<0.01),而B组和C组的切口愈合时间差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:闭合式痔切除术采用间断褥式外翻缝合有临床价值。 One hundred and fifty patients of hemorrhoidectomy were divided randomly into three groups. Wound was closed with interrupted exstrophy mattress suture in group A (50 cases), and with simple interrupted suture in group B (50 cases). Wound was left open in group C (50 cases). Results:The mean healing time was 12.6±3.1 days in group A,16.4±5.3 days in group B,and 16.6±2.9 days in group C. The healing was shorter in group A than in group B and C (P 〈0.01), but there was no significant defference in healing time between group B and group C ( P 〉0.05). Conclusion:It suggests that closed hemorrhoidectomy with interrupted exstrophy mattress suture is of clinical value of popularization.
作者 高激泳
出处 《大肠肛门病外科杂志》 2005年第2期108-110,共3页 Journal of Coloproctological Surgery
关键词 间断褥式外翻缝合 单纯间断缝合 Hemorrhoids Interrupted exstrophy mattress suture Simplex interrupted suture
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Arbman G, Krook H, Haapaniemis. Closed vs open hemorrhoidectomy-is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum, 2000,43: 61-64.
  • 2Ho YH, Seow-choen F, Tan M, et al. Randomized controlled trialof open and closed hemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 1997,84: 1729-1730.
  • 3Gencosmanoglu R, Sad o, Ko D, et al. Hemorrhoidectomy:open or closed technique. Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45:70-75.
  • 4史仁杰.日本肛门直肠常见疾病诊疗近况[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2000,20(3):24-25. 被引量:8

共引文献7

同被引文献28

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部