法律逻辑应注重对实质推理的研究——由一个案例引起的思考

Study on Essential Reasoning in Legal Logics——thinking from a case

实质推理是一种通过对若干存在矛盾冲突的推理前提内容法律价值的分析判定,从而确定该前提内容是否具有优先法律适用效力的推理和证明活动。实质推理最显著的特点是引入了辨证思维的方式,以法律价值判断作为分析判定的前提和基础,注重从推理的内容和形式的统一的角度来研究法律推理,注重用辨证思维的方式来正确处理法律适用中的矛盾冲突。对法律推理的研究,应从法律实践的实际需要出发,打破形式与内容的“楚河汉界”,从形式与内容的有机统一来加强和充实对法律推理的研究,走出“形式逻辑+法律事例”的简单模式,使法律逻辑的理论研究更好的为法律实践服务。

Essential reasoning is the reasoning and proving activities to analyze and judge the reasoning premises, contents and legal value of various existing contradictions and then to determine whether or not these premises possess legal effect. The most outstanding characteristics of essential reasoning lie in the introduction of dialectic ways of thinking, taking legal value judgment as the premise and basis for analysis and determination, attaching importance to studying legal reasoning from the perspective of the unification of reasoning contents and forms, attaching importance to using dialectic ways of thinking to deal with conflicts in legal application. Studying legal reasoning should start from the needs of legal practice out of the simple model of “form logics ＋ legal cases” so as to make legal logics provide better service to legal practice.