摘要
在为80例患者行经食道心房调搏(Transesophagealatrialpacing;TEAP)电生理检查术中,将用传统方法所测得的平均起搏阈值〔简称阈值(27.61±4.8)V〕作为基础对照,与分别用本文四步操作方法,即导管塑形;三个标志电极定位;诱导刺激;确定佳阈值所测得的平均阈值〔(19.0±3.1)V〕相比较,结果显示:用本文四步法可以显著降低平均阈值(P<0.05)。随着阈值的下降,可使84%(67/80)患者受检之苦明显减轻。
In a group of 80 cases receiving TEAP,a comparison was made between this 4-step and traditional TEAP. Our method is as follows:plasticky of TEAP electrode;three mapping electrode; in troducing stimulus; to ensure the optionalthreshold value. Threshold value (19.0±3.1)V,asa result of the 4-step method,was significantly lower than traditional value(27.61±4.8)V,(P<0.05).In 84%(67/80)patients,the discomfort (burning)were relieved,and the patients are morewilling to take the examination,Therefore,the 4-step method has a practical clinical value.
出处
《西安医科大学学报》
CSCD
1996年第1期112-113,共2页
Journal of Xi'an Medical University(Chinese)
关键词
电生理
经食道
心房调搏
起搏阈值
TEAP
electrophysiological examination
transesophageal atrial pacing(TEAP)
pacing threshold