摘要
对书证涵义的界定,反映了一个国家的书证观念。虽然各国对书证涵义的法律表述有所不同,但基于书证在各国实践的同等存在及人们具有揭示、认识事物本质的同等能力,各国对书证涵义又有相同认识。考察英美法系国家书证涵义及书证固有内涵,我国传统书证内涵与它们内涵相似,具有科学性与合理性,因而,并无不妥。但以这一内涵来理解和把握书证,可能出现书证与其他立法证据交叉、混淆与难于认定现象。造成这一现象的根源在于书证外延过宽,与我国立法实际不符,由此,作者提出了对书证外延应予限制的主张。
Our traditional connotation of letters and credentials is similar to that of America, Britain and France, which has its own scientific nature and rationalization, but using this connotation to comprehend and deal with letters and credentials can cause intersection between letters and credentials and other law proofs. Thus the writers offer to linfit spreading letters and credentials.
关键词
书证
涵义
比较
Letters and credentials
connotation
comparison
