汉、藏、回族司法精神病鉴定对比分析

A Compared Study of Forensic Psychiatrics Among the Han,Tibetan and Hui Nationality

目的:探讨汉、藏、回族涉案人群在司法精神病鉴定中存在的差异。方法:采用回顾性调查方法收集包括汉、藏、回族人群司法精神病鉴定案例共计507例相关资料,另外撒拉、土族、蒙古族等合计33例,因样本小予以忽略。对有关数据进行率的统计分析。结果:汉族涉案人群工人160人(39.7%),高中文化程度63人(15.6%),诊断精神分裂症86例(21.3%),构成比高于藏、回族。藏族涉案人群中男性43人(86.0%),暴力案件35例(70.0%),诊断无精神病20例(40.0%),构成比高于汉、回族。回族涉及经济案件11例(20.4%),诊断酒精所致精神障碍为零,有别于汉、藏族。三组涉案人群其责任能力评定无显蓍差别。结论:司法精神病例鉴定中汉、藏、回族一般人口学特征、案件类型、案件特征、疾病种类等方面存在有一定的差别,应注意各民族的经济、文化、民族风俗等对案件鉴定的影响,以避免做出错误的结论。

Objective： To explore the characteristics of forensic psychiatric expertise in the different of Han, Tibetan and Hui nationality. Methods： Forensic psychiatric data of 507 cases including Han, Tibetan and Hui nationality from 1982 to 2004 were reviewed retrospectively. Results： The percentage of episodes in the males in the Tibetan was higher than Han、Hui nationality. Level of education in Tibetan and Hui nationality was lower than the Han nationality. In expertise diagnosis, the percentage of schizophrenics was higher in the Han nationality. No significant difference of the value of responsibility among three nationalities. Conclusions： The results show that the characteristics of forensic psychiatric in various nationalities would provide expert testimony with some information for our work.