1Abboud TK, Zhu J, Richardson M,et al. Intravenous propofol vs thiamylal ～ is of lurane for caesarean section, comparative maternal and neonatal ef fects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1995,39(2) :205 ～ 209.
2Sanchez - Alcaraz A, Quintana MB, Laguarda M, et al. Placental transfer and neonatal effects of propofol in caesarean section. J Clin Pharm Ther.1998,23(1) :19 ～ 23.
3Valtonen M, Kanto J, Rosenberg P. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Anaesthesi a. 1989,44(9) :758 ～ 762.
6Djordjevic B, Stojiljkovic MP, Mostic T, et al. Propofol and thiopentone in elective cesarean section: effect on the mother and neonate. Vojnesanit Pregl, 1998,55(6) :601 ～ 604.
4Kamat SK, Shah MV, Chaudhary LS, et al. Effect of induction- delivery and uterine-delivery on apgar scoring of the newborn[J]. J Postgrad Med, 1991,37(3) : 125-127.
5Hein HA, Putman JM. Is propofol a proper proposition for repro- ductive procedures?[J]. J Clin Anesth, 1997,9 (8) : 611-613.
6Sanchez-Alearaz A, Quintana MB, Laguarda M. Placental transfer and neonatal effects of propofol in caesarean section[J]. J Clin Pharm Ther, 1998,23 ( 1 ) : 19-23.
7Iwama H, Kaneko T,Tobishima S, et al. Time dependency of the ratio of umbilical vein/maternal artery concentrations of veeuro- nium in caesarean section[J]. Acta Anaesthsiol Seand, 1999,43 (1):9-12.
