摘要
柏拉图的概念辩证法结束了古希腊辩证法与“客观规律”和“形式逻辑”的未分化状态,使辩证法具有了自己独立的形态。古希腊辩证法所揭示的是概念描述的初级形式,康德的辩证法反映了概念描述的高层次特性,黑格尔的辩证法代表着人类描述从两极对立走向对立两极之间联系的建立,而马克思则使辩证法转向实践。作为对两极对立的(二分的)描述方式反思和超越的结果,辩证法是一种描述方式。它是对形而上学绝对概念描述的超越。辩证法的客观化必定使人们的思维陷于混乱。
Dialectics got into shape when Plato's conceptual dialectics replaced ancient Greek dialectics and separated "objective laws" from "formal logic". While ancient Greek dialectics disclosed the basal form of concept description, Kant's dialectics embodied its features of high level. Later, Hegel established his dialectics that changed human beings' description from bipolar opposition to bipolar connection. But it was Marx who put dialectics into practice. As a reflection of dichotomy description and a result of absolute concept surpassing, dialectics is a method of description different from metaphysical description. And the objectification of dialectics will put human beings' thought into confusion.
出处
《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第6期12-17,共6页
Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目(02BZX001)
关键词
辩证法
描述
描述论
描述方式
dialectics
description
theory of description
descriptive method