期刊文献+

1978年~2003年中国生态足迹动态分析 被引量:163

Dynamics of Ecological Footprint of China from 1978 to 2003
下载PDF
导出
摘要 生态足迹是分析国家或地区自然资源可持续利用的重要指标.本文利用FAO数据、中国统计年鉴等自然资源生产与消费数据、人口数据,采用可变世界单产法计算了1978年~2003年中国生态足迹.结果表明,在研究时段内中国人均生态足迹由0.873ghm2升至1.547ghm2,增长率为77.2%;其中,耕地足迹下降0.051ghm2,能源足迹增长0.450ghm2,草地足迹增长0.103ghm2,林地足迹增长0.087ghm2,海水和淡水渔业足迹分别增长0.067ghm2和0.014ghm2,水电用地足迹增长0.005ghm2.与同期不断增加的生物供给力相比较,计算出中国生态赤字在逐年加剧,人均赤字由0.371ghm2上升至0.817ghm2,其中耕地由赤字(0.058ghm2)转为略有剩余(0.028ghm2),草地处于剩余状态,林地由剩余(0.007ghm2)转为赤字(0.095ghm2),中国化石能源足迹逐年增加,进一步加剧了林地短缺的危机,淡水和海水渔业足迹与供给力基本持平.分析了中国各类土地生态足迹、生物供给力和生态盈亏变化的原因,阐明了生态足迹与经济发展、资源经济产出率、资源利用效率之间的关系,指出了中国潜在的土地危机,针对生态足迹及生态赤字的影响因素,提出解决中国生态赤字加剧问题的对策. Ecological footprint is an important indicator to analyze the sustainable use of natural resources and has been widely used in the assessment on sustainable development worldwide. In this study, we got the data of resources production and consumption, population, and land use from FAO database, China Statistical Yearbook, China Energy Statistical Yearbook and the Ministry of Land and Resources. We calculated the ecological footprint of China during the period from 1978 to 2003 with the method of variable world average yield. The results are as follows: the ecological footprint has grown from 0.873ghm^2/cap to 1.547ghm^2/cap with the increase rate of 77.2%; the footprint of cropland has decreased 0.051ghm^2/cap; the footprint of energy has increased 0.450ghm^2/cap; the footprints of fresh water and sea water have increased 0.014ghm^2/cap and 0.067ghm^2/cap respectively; the footprint of forest land has increased 0.087ghm^2/cap; the footprint of grassland has increased 0. 104ghm^2/cap; and the footprint of hydro has increased 0.005ghm^2/cap. We find that the ecological deficit has been more and more serious, which is from 0.371ghm^2/cap in 1978 to 0. 817ghm^2/cap in 2003, through comparing the ecological footprint with the increasing biological capacity of the same period. The cropland was in the state of ecological deficit in 1978 (0.058ghm^2/cap) and changed into the state of ecological surplus (0.028ghm^2/cap) in 2003 ,while the grassland was also in the state of ecological surplus. The forestland was in a state of ecological surplus (0.007ghm^2 ) and changed into a state of ecological deficit (0.095ghm^2/cap) ; and the ecological deficit became more serious when the fossil energy footprint was taken into consideration. For the inland fishery and ocean fishery, the footprint was similar to the biocapacity, with a little ecological surplus. We analyze the reasons for the changes of ecological footprint, biocapacity and ecological deficit according to the results above and discuss the relationship between ecological footprint, economic development and utilization efficiency of resources. We consider that the land resources will be lacking along with the economic development and rapid urbanization in China. We provide the strategies to resolve the problems, such as increasing the productivity of grassland and forest land, promoting the structure of energy consumption, decreasing the use of fossil energy, increasing the utilization efficiency of resources, controlling the population and changing the economic increasing modes through the analysis of the influencing factors of ecological footprint and ecological deficit.
出处 《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第6期132-139,共8页 Resources Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目"区域城镇发展的复合生态管理"(编号:70433001)
关键词 生态足迹 中国 动态 土地利用 对策 Ecological footprint China Dynamic Land use Strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Rees W E. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out [J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2): 121 - 130.
  • 2Wackernagel M and Rees W E. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth [ M ] . Gabriola Island: New SocietyPublishers, 1996.
  • 3Erb K-H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926 - 2000: a variation on ecological footprint assessments [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 247 - 259.
  • 4Haberl H, Erb K-H, Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926- 1995[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 38:25-45.
  • 5Van Vuuren D P and Smeets E M W. Ecological footprints of Benin,Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands [ J ]. Ecological Economics,2000, 34(234): 115 - 130.
  • 6World Wildlife Fund. Living planet report. 2000[EB/OL]. http://www. panda. org/downloads/general/lpr. 2000. pdf, 2000-10-10.
  • 7World Wildlife Fund. Living planet report. 2002[EB/OL]. http://www. panda. org/downloads/general/LPR2002. pdf, 2002-06-10.
  • 8World Wildlife Fund. Living planet report. 2004[EB/OL]. http://www. panda. org/downloads/general/lpr 2004. pdf, 2004-10-10.
  • 9Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Erb K-H, et al. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961 -1999: comparing the conventional approach to an" actual land area"approach [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3) :261 - 269.
  • 10熊德国,鲜学福,姜永东.生态足迹理论在区域可持续发展评价中的应用及改进[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(6):618-626. 被引量:189

二级参考文献37

  • 1谢高地,鲁春霞,成升魁,郑度.中国的生态空间占用研究[J].资源科学,2001,23(6):20-23. 被引量:157
  • 2苏筠,成升魁,谢高地.大城市居民生活消费的生态占用初探——对北京、上海的案例研究[J].资源科学,2001,23(6):24-28. 被引量:103
  • 3鲁春霞,谢高地,成升魁,张镱锂.青藏高原自然资产利用的生态空间占用评价[J].资源科学,2001,23(6):27-35. 被引量:33
  • 4广州统计局编.广州统计年鉴(2001)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001..
  • 5澳门特别行政区环境委员会.澳门环境状况报告2000[R].澳门:澳门高意广告公司,2000..
  • 6[1]Mathis Wackernagel, William E Ress. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth [M]. Gabriola Island, B. C,. Canada:New Society Publishers, 1996.
  • 7[2]Mathis Wackernagel. Ecological Footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability[D]. Ph D Thesis. School of Community and Regional Planning, The University of British Columbia, Canada, 1994.
  • 8[3]Wackernagel M,Onisto L, Bello P et al. Ecological Footprints of Nations: How much nature do they use? How much nature do they have?[R]. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio + 5 Forum. International Council for Local Environment Initiatives, Toronto. 1997.
  • 9William E R. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ. Urban, 1992,(4): 121-130.
  • 10Wackenagel M, William E R. Our Ecological Footprint :Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, New Society Publishers, 1996.

共引文献1233

同被引文献1542

引证文献163

二级引证文献1293

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部