期刊文献+

采用定性定量经冠脉超声心肌声学造影对非闭塞性病变心肌灌注水平的探讨 被引量:1

Qualitative and quantitative intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography in detecting myocardial perfusion level in patients with coronary artery disease with coronary artery partial occlusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经冠状动脉超声心肌声学造影(myocardial contrast echocardiography,MCE)评价非完全闭塞性冠状动脉的狭窄程度与心肌灌注水平二者关系时,定性与定量分析方法的特点。方法35例住院患者行选择性冠状动脉造影,检测冠状动脉病变程度;经冠状动脉注射造影剂行实时MCE,采用记分的方式对结果进行视觉定性分析,并由定量分析得到以下参数造影剂峰值密度(A)、曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)、峰值时间(time to peak intensity,TP);利用统计学方法对相应心肌节段的组织灌注情况进行分析。结果35例患者冠状动脉造影正常6例(17%),其余29例(83%)至少有1支血管狭窄≥50%;MCE检测210个心肌节段中有167个(79.6%)获得较满意图像,定性分析从中发现异常心肌灌注节段17个(12.2%),均来自病变组;而定量分析显示,与正常组比较,轻度狭窄组无明显变化,中度狭窄组AUC明显降低(P<0.05),重度狭窄组A、AUC和TP值均产生显著变化(P<0.05)。结论MCE定性分析能直观检测病变血管所对应心肌的异常灌注状况,而定量分析能更好的反映病变血管与心肌灌注水平的关系。 Objective To investigate the different characteristics of qualitative and quantitative intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography ( MCE ) in evaluation of myocardial perfusion level in patients of coronary artery disease with coronary artery partial occlusion. Methods A total of 35 patients underwent selective coronary angiography, and then were intracoronarily injected with reagent SonoVue to perform MCE. Qualitative analysis was taken by visual valuing images with score on the segmental myocardial perfusion situation. Then contrast peak intensity (A), time to peak intensity (TP) and area under the curve (AUC) were quantitated with time-intensity curve obtained by equipment attached software. Results The results of angiography showed that, out of 35 patients, the coronary artery stenosis of 6 patients were normal ( 〈 50% ) , and that of 29 patients were abnormal (≥50% ). MCE produced a total of 210 corresponding myocardial perfusion images. Among them, 167 (79.6%) images were of good quality. The qualitative analysis detected 17 (12.2%) abnormal myocardial perfusion segments. Quantitative analysis results showed that, compared to normal group, the 3 myocardial perfusion parameters did not show significant change in mild abnormal stenosis group, whereas the AUC value markedly decreased ( P 〈 0.05 ) in moderate group, and all 3 parameters significantly changed in severe group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Qualitative analysis shows potential in direct visual determination of abnormal myocardial perfusion. Quantitative analysis properly reflects the relationship between stenosis magnitude and abnormality of myocardial perfusion with a relatively high efficiency.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第21期2180-2183,共4页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
关键词 经冠状动脉超声心肌声学造影 冠状动脉造影 非闭塞性冠状动脉疾病 intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography coronary angiography non-total occlusion coronary artery disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Balcells E, Powers E R, Lepper W, et al. Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, 41(5): 827-833.
  • 2Vernon S M, Camarano G, Kaul S, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography demonstrates that collateral flow can preserve myocardial function beyond a chronically occluded coronary artery[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1996, 78(8): 958-960.
  • 3Ragosta M, Camarano G, Kaul S, et al. Microvascular integrity indicates myocellular viability in patients with recent myocardial infarction. New insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography[J]. Circulation, 1994, 89(6): 2562-2569.
  • 4Sheikh K H, Bengtson J R, Helmy S, et al. Relation of quantitative coronary lesion measurements to the development of exercise-induced ischemia assessed by exercise echocardiography[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990, 15(5): 1043-1051.
  • 5Korosoglou G, da Silva K G Jr, Labadze N, et al. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for pharmacologic stress testing: is quantitative estimation of myocardial blood flow reserve necessary[J]? J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2004, 17(1): 1-9.
  • 6Laffitte S, Masugata H, Peters B, et al. Comparative value of dobutamine and adenosine stress in the detection of coronary stenosis with myocardial contrast echocardiography[J]. Circulation, 2000,103(22): 2724-2730.
  • 7Peltier M, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, et al. Assessment of the physiologic significance of coronary disease with dipyridamole real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 43(2): 257-264.
  • 8Ay T, London V, d¢Hondt A M, et al. Quantification of coronary flow reserve with myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans: comparison with positron emission tomography [J]. Circulation, 2001,104 (suppl II): II-589.
  • 9Galiuto L, May Newman K, Del Balzo U, et al. Assessment of coronary stenoses of graded severity by myocardial contrast echocardiography[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2002, 15(3): 197-205.
  • 10Agati L, Voci P, Bilotta F, et al. Dipyridamole myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: perfusion, anatomic, and functional correlates[J]. Am Heart J, 1994, 128(1): 28-35.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部