期刊文献+

区间估计:AHP指标筛选的一种方法 被引量:27

Range Estimation Priority: A Method to Sift Out Weak-weighted Criteria in AHP
原文传递
导出
摘要 分析了弱权重指标对层次分析法判断矩阵不一致性的负面影响,提出了识别和剔除弱权重指标的基本原理,以及利用层次分析的区间估计剔除弱权重指标的步骤、方法.它尤其适合于决策者希望通过借鉴一个较大的一般指标集建立具体评价问题的指标集的情形.弱权重指标的剔除有助于提高决策者权重比较的精确度,决策者也不再需要收集各方案在那些弱权重上的表现信息,从而提高了层次分析法的应用性. In this paper, it is shown priority vectors are full of deviations and uncertainties. This occurs due to the decision-makers' uncertainties and errors in comparisons as well as inconsistencies in judgment matrices in Analytical Hierarchy ProFess (AHP). The contribution to evaluation goals of the criteria with very weak weights may be submerged in such deviations and uncertainties, which makes those criteria meaningless and should be sifted out. The concept and method to sift such criteria out are proposed in this paper. This method allows decision-makers to identify and sift out weak-weighted criteria; this is especially helpful for decision-makers who want to build a set of criteria for a specific problem from a large set of criteria for general purposes. With downsizing in criteria numbers, decision- makers are expected to make fewer errors in judgment, and it's easier for judgment matrices to reach consistency. Moreover, the performance information of each alternative on those weak-weighted criteria is no more necessary, which further improves the usability of AHP. It's proved that this method is feasible, convenient and robust by the numerical case provided in this paper.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第10期73-77,共5页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金重大项目(70433003) 863项目(2003AA-413033)
关键词 层次分析法 区间估计 指标筛选 弱权重指标 不一致性 analytical hierarchy process range estimation priority weak-weighted criterion uncertainty inconsistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sekitani K, Yamaki N. A logical interpretation for the eigenvalue method in AHP [ J ]. Journal of the Operations Research Japan Society, 1999, 42(2): 219 - 232.
  • 2TLSaaty 许树柏.层次分析法[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1988..
  • 3Crawford G,William C A. A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1985,(29): 387 - 405.
  • 4Cogger K O,Yu P L. Eigen weight vectors and least distance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratio[J].Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, 1985, 46: 483 - 491.
  • 5Saaty T L. Decision-making with the AHP, Why is the principal eigenvector necessary [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145: 85-91.
  • 6Saaty T L. Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in analytic hierarchy process [J]. Applied Mathematics Letters, 1998,(11): 121-125.
  • 7Saaty T L, Vargas L G. Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least square and least square methods in estimating ratio [ J ]. Journal of Mathematical Modeling, 1984, (5): 309 - 324.
  • 8Lipovetsky S, Conklin W M. Decision aiding robust estimation of priority in AHP [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000, 137: 110-122.
  • 9Saaty T L. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process [M]. Pittsburgh PA: RWS Publications, 1994.
  • 10Saaty T L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process [M]. Pittsburgh PA: RWS Publications, 1996.

二级参考文献12

  • 1汪浩,马达.层次分析标度评价与新标度方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1993,13(5):24-26. 被引量:128
  • 2侯岳衡,沈德家.指数标度及其与几种标度的比较[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(10):43-46. 被引量:117
  • 3He Kun (Petrochemical Technology College, ECUST, Shanghai 200540).层次分析法的标度研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(6):58-61. 被引量:64
  • 4刘豹,系统工程学报,1991年,6卷,1期,70页
  • 5刘豹,系统工程,1984年,2期,23页
  • 6王莲芬,层次分析法引论,1990年
  • 7赵焕臣,层次分析法.一种简易的决策方法,1986年
  • 8左军,系统工程,1998年,16卷,6期,56页
  • 9徐泽水,系统工程,1997年,15卷,增刊,204页
  • 10SaatyTL 许树柏 译.层次分析法[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1988..

共引文献200

同被引文献217

引证文献27

二级引证文献161

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部