期刊文献+

声品质主观评价的分组成对比较法研究 被引量:53

Grouped pair-wise comparison for subjective sound quality evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 声品质主观评价实验中,大样本量的成对比较法评价实验由于评价时间随样本量的平方增长而变得难以实现,为此提出了可有效减少评价工作量并使得实验易于实现的分组成对比较法。将总体评价样本分成具有相互联系的n个样本组分别进行主观评价,通过各组间的关联样本将各组的评价结果进行反演构建,得到总体样本的评价结果,进而分析其声品质特征。以车内噪声为例,介绍了分组成对比较法的实现方法,并与传统成对比较法以及语义细分法实验结果进行了对比分析,两者结果获得较好的一致性,证明了分组成对比较主观评价实验方法的有效性。 In subjective sound quality pair-wise comparison evaluation, time consumption grows with square of number of sound stimuli, which made the evaluation of large quantity of stimuli difficult to carry out. A grouped pair-wise comparison design (GPC) is proposed to greatly decrease time requirement and difficulties of subjective comparison test, where the whole evaluation stimuli are divided into n test groups, with reference link stimuli among each group. From subjective results of each group, final results of all stimuli are reconstructed, and their sound quality can be analyzed. With car interior sound stimuli as example, realization of the proposed GPC method is introduced. The results of GPC method are in good agreement with those obtained from pair-wise comparison and semantic differential method.
出处 《声学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第6期515-520,共6页 Acta Acustica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(10374071)
关键词 成对比较法 主观评价 声品质 分组 评价实验 评价结果 样本量 相互联系 品质特征 Acoustics Automobiles Evaluation Quality control Sampling Signal to noise ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Blauert J, Jekosch U. Sound-quality evaluation - A multilayered problem. Acta Acustica United With Acustica,1997; 83(5): 747-753.
  • 2Otto N et al. Guidelines for jury evaluations of automotive sounds. Proceeding of the 1999 Noise and Vibration Conference, Traverse City, Michigan, USA, 1999. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-1822.
  • 3Guski R. Psychological methods for evaluating sound quality and assessing acoustic information. Acta Acustica United With Acustica, 1997; 83(5): 765-774.
  • 4Bodden M, Heinrichs R, Linow A. Evaluation of interior vehichle noise using an efficient psychoacoustic method. Proceeding of Euronoise 98, Munich, Germany, 1998.
  • 5Chouard N. Perception of overall loudness and unpleasantness. Proceeding of Inter-noise 98, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998.
  • 6Susini P, McAdams S, and Winsberg S. A multidimensional technique for sound quality assessment. Acta Acustica United With Acustica, 1999; 85(5): 650-656.
  • 7毛东兴,俞悟周,王佐民.声品质成对比较主观评价的数据检验及判据[J].声学学报,2005,30(5):468-472. 被引量:70
  • 8Bradley R A, Terry M E. The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. 1. The method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1952; 39(4): 324-345.
  • 9Otto N. A subjective evaluation and analysis of automotive starter sounds. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 1993;41(3): 377-382.
  • 10周迅溢,王蓓,杨玉芳.关于汉语音节知觉空间的实验研究[J].声学学报,2003,28(3):235-240. 被引量:3

二级参考文献13

  • 1Kruscal J B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 1964;29:1--26.
  • 2Singh S, Woods, Becker D R, G M. Perceptual structure of 22 prevocalic English consonants. Journal Acoustic of Social America, 1972; 52:1968--1713.
  • 3Blauert J, Jekosch U. Sound quality evaluation - a multilayered problem. Acta Acustica, 1997; 83(3): 747-753.
  • 4Fastl H. The psychoacoustics of sound-quality evaluation.Acta Acustica, 1997; 83(3): 754-764.
  • 5Zwicker E, Fastl H. Psychoacoustics: Facts and models(2nd Edition). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999.
  • 6Otto N et al. Guidelines for jury evaluations of automotive sounds. Proceeding of the 1999 Noise and Vibration Conference, Traverse City, Michigan, USA, 1999. SAE Paper No.1999-01-1822.
  • 7Kendall M G, Smith B B. On the method of paired comparisons. Biometvika, 1940; 31(3/4): 324-345.
  • 8Kendall M G. Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 1955; 11(1): 43-62.
  • 9Weber R. Interior car sound quality-assessment of acceleration noises. 2nd Forum Acusticum, Berlin, Germany,1999.
  • 10Parizet E. Paired comparison listening tests and circular error rates. ACTA Acustica United with Acustica, 2002;SS(4): 594-598.

共引文献69

同被引文献382

引证文献53

二级引证文献253

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部